Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 26;8(10):373. doi: 10.3390/plants8100373

Table 2.

Detection of QTL associated with plant height in two populations across the three different environments by CIM method.

Population QTL a Chr. Position (cM) Marker Interval LOD b Confidence interval (cM) c Physical Region (Mb) d A e R2 (%) f Env. ReportedQTL/Gene g
MT qPH-2-1MT (QPH-2) 2 19.3 T_bin192–T_bin193 3.8 18.1–21.5 4.5–5.2 −2.7 3.0 2014YC Plant height 13-1
qPH-6-2MT 6 82.8 T_bin992–T_bin993 28.6 82.6–83.0 19.1–21.9 −9.8 29.3 2014YC E1
83.0 T_bin994–T_bin995 26.9 82.7–83.2 −13.9 19.4 2014JP
83.0 T_bin994–T_bin995 14.1 82.7–83.3 −7.8 13.7 2012JP
qPH-6-3MT 6 87.1 T_bin1020–T_bin1021 26.4 87.0–87.4 42.9–45.4 −12.7 19.2 2014JP Plant height 3-2
(QPH-6) 89.8 T_bin1028–T_bin1029 13.3 89.6–92.7 −7.0 13.0 2012JP
qPH-15-1MT 15 60.7 T_bin2638–T_bin2639 3.2 59.3–61.0 14.4–15.4 3.6 1.8 2014JP Novel
qPH-16-1MT 16 67.9 T_bin2836–T_bin2837 3.4 66.7–68.5 30.3–30.8 −2.5 2.7 2014JP E9
qPH-19-1MT 19 97.7 T_bin3421–T_bin3422 23.8 97.0–98.7 44.9–45.5 7.6 22.2 2014YC Dt1
(QPH-19) 97.3 T_bin3420–T_bin3421 55.7 96.5–97.8 19.4 50.7 2014JP
97.3 T_bin3420–T_bin3421 31.2 96.5–97.9 11.0 33.9 2012JP
ZM qPH-5-1ZM 5 51.4 Z_bin554–Z_bin555 2.9 48.9–53.4 32.1–32.9 −2.9 6.1 2014JP Plant height 26-1
qPH-6-2ZM 6 117.7 Z_bin718–Z_bin719 6.5 117.3–118.7 37.8–43.9 −7.1 11.3 2012JP Plant height 3-2
(QPH-6) 118.6 Z_bin719–Z_bin720 7.5 117.3–122.8 −8.6 12.7 2014JP
qPH-7-1ZM 7 100.2 Z_bin879–Z_bin880 3.0 98.6–101.0 38.0–38.6 3.0 6.5 2014YC Plant height 37-5
qPH-9-1ZM 9 110.6 Z_bin1195–Z_bin1196 4.6 109.7–111.5 40.7–42.4 −5.3 7.6 2012JP Plant height 33-5
108.6 Z_bin1192–Z_bin1193 2.8 106.6–111.9 −4.3 3.9 2014JP
qPH-10-1ZM 10 104.2 Z_bin1330–Z_bin1331 3.4 102.7–106.8 43.6–44.4 4.8 5.5 2012JP E2
104.2 Z_bin1330–Z_bin1331 4.5 101.7–105.1 6.1 7.2 2014JP
qPH-17-1ZM (QPH-17) 17 134.1 Z_bin2179–Z_bin2180 2.7 126.0–135.1 40.3–41.9 −4.1 4.2 2012JP Novel
134.1 Z_bin2179–Z_bin2180 5.1 132.7–135.1 −6.4 8.2 2014JP
127.7 Z_bin2175–Z_bin2176 3.8 126.9–128.6 −3.5 9.0 2014YC
qPH-18-1ZM 18 88.3 Z_bin2283–Z_bin2284 4.0 85.1–91.0 53.5–54.6 3.6 9.3 2014YC Dt2
qPH-19-1ZM 19 108.8 Z_bin2431–Z_bin2432 15.0 108.4–109.5 44.6–45.9 11.4 30.9 2012JP Dt1
(QPH-19) 108.8 Z_bin2431–Z_bin2432 10.8 108.2–110.1 10.2 19.7 2014JP

a QTLs detected in different environments at the same; adjacent or overlapping marker intervals were considered the same QTL. b LOD value at the peak > 2.5. c 1-LOD support confidence intervals (confidence interval length, cM). d physical location of the confidence interval of QTLs in the Glycine max Wm82.a1 reference genome (Mb). e The additive effect of QTLs. The positive values indicated that the allele of the QTL came from the common parent M8206 can increase plant height. While negative the values indicate that the allele of the QTL came from other parents that can increase plant height. f Phenotypic variance (%) explained by the QTL. g The name of QTL for plant height in Soybase [13] or the gene name which associated with plant height within the QTL interval.