Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 7;10(23):5681–5688. doi: 10.7150/jca.32986

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with DFS of HCC patients

Variables Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Univariate analysis
Panx1 (low, moderate vs high) 1.824 (1.187-2.801) 0.006
Gender (male vs female) 1.446 (0.342-6.112) 0.616
Age (>50 vs ≤50) 1.188 (0.534-2.647) 0.673
HBV (positive vs negative) 0.383 (0.051-2.854) 0.349
Tumor size (>5cm vs ≤5cm) 3.082 (1.423-6.674) 0.004
Liver cirrhosis (yes vs no) 0.544 (0.219-1.351) 0.189
Microvascular involvement (positive vs negative) 4.803 (2.223-10.380) <0.001
Differentiation (Poorly vs well+moderately) 2.721 (1.088-6.805) 0.032
TNM stage (III vs I-II) 5.144 (1.938-13.655) 0.001
Lymph node metastasis (yes vs no) 1.494 (0.563-4.729) 0.102
AFP (>20ng/ml vs ≤20ng/m) 0.893 (0.360-2.212) 0.806
Multivariate analysis
Panx1 (low, moderate vs high) 2.344 (1.473-3.730) <0.001
TNM stage (III vs I-II) 4.029 (1.476-10.999) 0.007
Microvascular involvement (positive vs negative) 3.426(1.451-8.090) 0.005

P<0.05 was considered statistically significant