Liang 2001.
Methods | Randomised: methods of randomisation and allocation concealment were not described. Non‐blind Blank‐controlled Duration: 15 days. ITT analysis: none were lost to follow‐up. |
|
Participants | Country: single centre in China. Number of participants: 77 (23 female and 54 male). Age: average: 60.4 years in the Cere group, 61.2 years in the control group. Inclusion: VaD according to DSM‐III‐R and ICD‐10 criteria, with a Hachinski score of ≥ 7. Exclusion: not specified. The study groups had similar baseline characteristics. |
|
Interventions | Cere group: Cere 20 mL + physiological saline 200 mL + routine treatment Control group: routine treatment Cere administered by i.v. infusions once daily for 15 days. |
|
Outcomes | HDS | |
Notes | Participants in both groups were treated with other medicine according to participant's condition, but whether those drugs were balanced between groups or would impact the results was not specified. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of randomisation was not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of allocation concealment was not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding was used according to the report; placebos or blank controlled solutions were not used for blinding. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding was used according to the report; placebos or blank controlled solutions were not used for blinding. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | None of the enrolled participants were lost to the study. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The study protocol is not available. The only outcome measure listed in the outcome section was reported, but safety results, which would be expected to have been reported for such a study, were not mentioned. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Participants in both groups were treated with other medicine according to participant's condition, but whether those drugs were balanced between groups or would impact the results was not specified. |