Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 30;47(20):10815–10829. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz821

Table 1.

Pol II-dependent AID-catalyzed deamination on IGHV3-23*01 substrate

Experiment No. of sequenced Ca No. of C to T mutations Mutation rate (× 10−5)b Average ± SD t-testc
Non-transcribed strand
NTS-control 1 3469440 110 3.2 -
NTS +Pol II 1 541824 15 2.8 -
NTS + AID 1 1926144 76 3.9
2 5186928 191 3.7
3 6159120 227 3.7 3.8 ± 0.1
NTS+ Pol II + AID 1 648576 132 20.4
2 4347888 1405 32.3
3 4694496 1787 38.1 30.2 ± 7.4
P = 0.046
NTS + Pol II + AID + DSIF 1 4221600 2400 56.9
2 4561776 2310 50.6 53.7 ± 3.1
Transcribed strand
TS-control 1 5574690 180 3.2 -
TS + Pol II 1 1922052 49 2.5 -
TS + AID 1 3291222 192 5.8
2 9993060 593 5.9
3 5402298 228 4.2 5.3 ± 0.8
TS + Pol II + AID 1 2713590 1573 58.0
2 6243336 2632 42.2
3 4165854 1672 40.1 46.8 ± 8.0
P = 0.208
TS + Pol II + AID + DSIF 1 5415564 1719 31.7
2 4594854 1721 37.5 34.6 ± 2.9

aTotal number of all sequenced dC bases (48 sites on NTS strand and 66 sites on TS strand) from qualified UID family-reads (see Materials and Methods for details).

bMutation rates for each experiment were calculated as the total number of C to T mutations on the NTS or TS divided by the total numbers of all sequenced C templates on the NTS or TS, respectively. When shown, average mutation rates represent average ± standard deviation.

c P values from two-tailed Student's t-test are shown for comparison of NTS mutation rates in the absence and the presence of DSIF, and TS mutation rates in the absence and the presence of DSIF.