Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):789–813. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz055

Table 7.

Significant activation likelihood clusters for conjunctions and subtractions analyses for the self/other cognitive perspective taking factor with studies using an SS or an EC paradigm

Cluster no. Hemisphere BA Label Cluster center Volume
(mm3)
Hemis
phere
BA Label Cluster foci
x y z x y z
SEO ∩ STO ALE value
 Clusters found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
  1 Left 40 IPL −58 −26 38 920 Left 40 IPL −58 −26 38 0.0262
  2 Right 40 IPL 62 −23 37 608 Right 40 IPL 62 −24 36 0.0192
  3 Left 6 PreCG −51 7 27 552 Left 6 PreCG −50 6 28 0.0164
Left 44 IFG −52 10 18 0.0143
  4 Left 13 AI −32 21 6 512 Left 13 AI −30 22 46 0.0198
−58 −26 38 Left 13 AI −36 20 4 0.0143
 No additional cluster found with an FDRpN < 0.05 threshold
SEO > STO Z score
 No cluster found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
 No cluster found with a voxel-wise FDRpN < 0.05 threshold
STO > SEO Z score
 No cluster found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
 No cluster found with a voxel-wise FDRpN < 0.05 threshold
SEO ∩ OTO ALE value
 Clusters found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
  1 Left 40 IPL −58 −25 32 2176 Left 40 IPL −58 −26 38 0.0262
Left 40 IPL −58 −22 28 0.0226
  2 Left 32 ACC −4 22 37 1976 Left 32 ACC −4 26 36 0.0241
Left 32 ACC −4 22 30 0.0209
Left 32 MFG −4 14 46 0.0169
  3 Left 13 AI −33 20 5 1088 Left 13 AI −34 20 6 0.0248
Left Claustrum −36 12 0 0.0154
  4 Right 40 IPL 62 −23 37 936 Right 40 IPL 62 −24 38 0.0206
  5 Left 44 IFG −55 9 11 384 Left 44 IFG −54 8 12 0.0189
  6 Left 13 AI −40 −2 13 168 Left 13 AI −38 −2 14 0.0129
  7 Left Claustrum −40 3 0 32 Left Claustrum −40 4 0 0.0127
  8 Left Claustrum −40 0 2 24 Left Claustrum −40 0 2 0.0117
  9 Left 13 AI −42 4 −2 8 Left 13 AI −42 4 −2 0.0109
  10 Left 13 AI −38 10 0 8 Left 13 AI −38 10 0 0.0126
 No additional cluster found with a cluster-level inference < 0.05 and an FDRpN < 0.01 threshold
SEO > OTO Z score
 Clusters found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
  1 Left 13 AI −41 7 5 56 Left 13 AI −40 6 5 3.3528
  2 Left 13 AI −36 8 6 8 Left 13 AI −36 8 6 3.1560
 No additional cluster found with an FDRpN < 0.05 threshold
OTO > SEO Z score
 No cluster found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
 No cluster found with a voxel-wise FDRpN < 0.05 threshold
OTO ∩ STO ALE value
 Clusters found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
  1 Right 2 PosCG 60 −22 36 1272 Right 2 PosCG 60 −20 36 0.0223
Right 40 IPL 56 −30 40 0.0144
  2 Left 13 AI −35 21 4 1000 Left 13 AI −42 20 2 0.0205
Left Claustrum −28 22 6 0.0200
  3 Left 40 IPL −58 −26 38 840 Left 40 IPL −58 −26 38 0.0300
  4 Left 37 ITG −45 −70 −4 600 Left 37 ITG −44 −70 −2 0.0212
  5 Right 6 SFG 5 14 58 464 Right 6 SFG 6 14 58 0.0218
   6 Left 44 IFG −52 10 16 8 Left 44 IFG −52 10 16 0.0128
 No additional cluster found with an FDRpN < 0.05 threshold
OTO > STO Z score
 No cluster found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
 No cluster found with a voxel-wise FDRpN < 0.05 threshold
STO > OTO Z score
 Clusters found with a P-uncorrected < 0.001 threshold
  1 Right Cerebellum 32 −91 −8 1048 Right Cerebellum 33 −91 −8 3.7190
Right 18 IOG 32 −96 0 3.5401
  2 Left Cerebellum −36 −65 −16 136 Left Cerebellum −37 −65 −15 3.7190
  3 Left 13 IFG −46 25 2 136 Left 13 IFG −45 26 1 3.7190
  4 Right 6 SFG 8 15 54 112 Right 6 SFG 8 16 54 3.7190
 No additional cluster found with an FDRpN < 0.05 threshold

Higher ALE values or Z scores are associated with greater probability of activation across experiments.