Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 9;47(20):10489–10505. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz580

Table 2.

Advantages and disadvantages of the current methods used to detect microRNAs.

Methods Advantages Disadvantages References
qPCR Widely used method for sensitivity. Lack of multiplexing and genome-wide coverage, biases and errors due to exponential amplification. (86)
Northern blotting Detects non-amplified microRNAs. Requirement of large amount of starting materials, radioactivity, less sensitive, time consuming, labor-intensive. (87)
In situ hybridization Spatiotemporal distribution in cells or tissue sections. Laborious, requires specialized skills and instruments, time consuming, non-specific. (88)
Microarray Provides genome-wide coverage. Requires specific probes and specialized equipment, data normalization is difficult and lacks reproducibility among various platforms. (89)
Next generation sequencing Provides genome-wide coverage, identifies novel microRNAs and SNPs in microRNAs. Requires specialized equipment, skilled bioinformatician, complicated data analysis. (90)
Isothermal exponential amplification High sensitivity, efficient signal amplification, does not require thermocycling equipment. Requires multiple enzymes including a nicking enzyme and probe design is complicated. (93)