Table 1.
Overall (N = 38) | Workshop (N = 13) | Apprenticeship (N = 12) | Consult (N = 13) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | p value† | |
Sex | 0.77 | ||||||||
Female | 33 | 86.8 | 11 | 84.6 | 10 | 83.3 | 12 | 92.3 | |
Male | 5 | 13.2 | 2 | 15.4 | 2 | 16.7 | 1 | 7.7 | |
Race/ethnicity | 0.4 | ||||||||
White, non-Latino | 29 | 76.3 | 10 | 76.9 | 11 | 91.7 | 8 | 61.5 | |
Black, non-Latino | 3 | 7.9 | 1 | 7.7 | 1 | 8.3 | 1 | 7.7 | |
Asian, non-Latino | 3 | 7.9 | 2 | 15.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 7.7 | |
White, Latino | 2 | 5.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 15.4 | |
Other, non-Latino | 1 | 2.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 7.7 | |
Type of clinician | 0.96 | ||||||||
Physician’s assistant | 14 | 36.8 | 5 | 38.5 | 4 | 33.3 | 5 | 38.5 | |
Nurse | 19 | 50.0 | 6 | 46.2 | 6 | 50.0 | 7 | 53.8 | |
Doctor | 5 | 13.2 | 2 | 15.4 | 2 | 16.7 | 1 | 7.7 | |
Highest degree earned | 0.69 | ||||||||
Associate’s | 4 | 10.5 | 1 | 7.7 | 2 | 16.7 | 1 | 7.7 | |
Bachelor’s | 14 | 36.8 | 6 | 46.2 | 4 | 33.3 | 4 | 30.8 | |
Master’s | 14 | 36.8 | 4 | 30.8 | 3 | 25.0 | 7 | 53.8 | |
Doctorate | 6 | 15.8 | 2 | 15.4 | 3 | 25.0 | 1 | 7.7 | |
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
Age in years | 35.3 | 11.0 | 39.2 | 13.2 | 34.4 | 8.9 | 32.2 | 10.1 | 0.27 |
Motivation for MI* | |||||||||
Interested in learning MI* | 8.1 | 1.7 | 8.2 | 1.6 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 1.2 | 0.97 |
Confident in ability to use MI* | 4.6 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 0.50 |
Likely to use MI* | 5.3 | 3.5 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 5.8 | 3.1 | 0.87 |
Mean motivation score* | 6.0 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 2.6 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 0.66 |
Estimated % of patients currently misusing substances | 49.6 | 19.9 | 49.2 | 19.3 | 44.2 | 19.8 | 55.0 | 20.8 | 0.41 |
Column percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
*Motivation items were measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely)
†p values are from Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables