Skip to main content
letter
. 2019 Aug 26;34(11):2348–2350. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05113-4

Table 2.

The Association of Patient Language Preference with CKD Processes of Care

N Yes (row %) Age, sex-adjusted p value Fully adjusted p value
RR CI RR CI
ACR order
  English (n = 1439) 593 (41%) Ref Ref
  Non-English (n = 287) 153 (53%) 1.34 (1.17, 1.53) 0.00 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) 0.66
A1c order
  English (n = 540) 529 (98%) Ref Ref
  Non-English (n = 163) 160 (98%) 0.99 (0.97, 1.02) 0.64 0.99 (0.96, 1.02) 0.58
Statin Rx
  English (n = 1315) 865 (66%) Ref Ref
  Non-English (n = 284) 219 (77%) 1.13 (1.06, 1.22) 0.00 1.01 (0.94, 1.09) 0.80
ACE/ARB Rx
  English (n = 1199) 867 (72%) Ref Ref
  Non-English (n = 264) 192 (73%) 0.98 (0.89, 1.08) 0.68 0.90 (0.82, 0.99) 0.02
BP control
  English (n = 1439) 1075 (75%) Ref Ref
  Non-English (n = 287) 213 (74%) 1.03 (0.96, 1.11) 0.43 1.05 (0.96, 1.14) 0.30
A1c < 7
  English (n = 529) 301 (57%) Ref Ref
  Non-English (n = 160) 94 (59%) 0.95 (0.75, 1.20) 0.66 0.97 (0.75, 1.25) 0.80

Age, sex-adjusted: adjusted for age, sex only; clustered on provider (n = 152)

Fully adjusted: additionally adjusted for race/ethnicity, insurance type, number of PC visits, CKD stage, and count of comorbid conditions