Skip to main content
letter
. 2019 Jul 16;34(11):2342–2344. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05157-6

Table 2.

Fluoroquinolone Prescribing Based on Academic Versus Non-academic Clinic

Outcome Academic clinic
N = 56
Non-academic clinic
N = 160
P value*
Composite outcome for inappropriate prescription, n (%) 41 (73.2) 152 (95.0) < 0.001
  By provider, n/n (%)
    Resident physician 31/40 (77.5) 2/2 (100)
    Advanced practice provider 1/2 (50.0) 29/31 (93.5) 0.209
    Attending physician 9/14 (64.3) 121/127 (95.3) 0.013§
Inappropriate indication, n (%) 36 (64.3) 138 (86.3) < 0.001
Unnecessary prescription, n (%) 6 (10.7) 54 (33.8) 0.001
Excessive duration, n (%) 27 (48.2) 104 (65.0) 0.027
Insufficient duration, n (%) 1 (1.8) 2 (1.3) 1.00
Inappropriate dose, n (%) 19 (33.9) 85 (53.1) 0.013
Bug-drug mismatch, n (%) 2 (3.6) 12 (7.5) 1.000
Adverse drug reaction within 30 days|, n (%) 1 (1.8) 5 (3.1) 1.000

*< 0.05 is considered statistically significant

The primary composite outcome was the percentage of inappropriate fluoroquinolone prescriptions classified by at least one of the following: inappropriate indication, unnecessary prescription, inappropriate duration, inappropriate dose, or bug-drug mismatch. Inappropriate indication = prescriptions for diagnoses in which fluoroquinolones are not recommended; unnecessary prescription = diagnoses with no indication for antibiotics; bug-drug mismatch = treatment of a bacterial pathogen identified on culture with intermediate or resistant susceptibility to fluoroquinolones

Comparison between residents and advanced practice providers

§Comparison between resident and attending

|Yeast infection (n = 2), gastrointestinal upset (n = 2), seizure (n = 1), and arthralgia (n = 1)