Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;85(11):2512–2523. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14063

Table 2A.

Inflammatory profile

Randomization Week 26 group differences P‐value
Liraglutide Placebo Liraglutide Placebo Liraglutide vs placebo
IFN‐y 11.6 (7.6, 21.55) 7.81 (5.42, 16.45) 7.67 (5.96, 13.8) 9.47 (5.21, 12.6) −18.7% (−47.6, 26.1) .354
IL‐10 0.49 (0.31, 0.64) 0.39 (0.35, 0.59) 0.38 (0.32, 0.63) 0.41 (0.3, 0.63) −7.2% (−26.4, 17.0) .528
IL‐6 1.18 (0.73, 2.06) 0.94 (0.79, 1.45) 0.84 (0.64, 1.12) 1.00 (0.79, 1.44) −22.6% (−38.1, −3.2) .025
IL‐8 13.6 (11.85, 16.8) 13.43 (11.43, 17.65) 14.35 (10.25, 16.1) 14.35 (12, 20.35) −5.8% (−20.3, 11.3) .483
TNF‐a 3.27 (3, 4.01) 2.91 (2.67, 3.58) 3.21 (2.95, 3.87) 3.01 (2.64, 3.42) 3.8% (−4.4, 12.8) .369
CD206 0.3 (0.23, 0.33) 0.21 (0.18, 0.26) 0.27 (0.25, 0.35) 0.21 (0.19, 0.25) −5.3% (−12.3, 2.3) .167
CD163 2.03 (1.63, 2.81) 1.88 (1.5, 2.51) 1.88 (1.6, 2.56) 1.87 (1.58, 2.39) −1.8% (−7.5, 4.1) .536

The proinflammatory cytokines and macrophages markers in response 26 weeks of liraglutide treatment are secondary endpoints. Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or median and (interquartile range). Estimates of test for treatment effect are in % or absolute values (95%CL) [P values for group difference]. IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; TNF = tumour necrosis factor; UACR = urine albumin/creatinine ratio; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. Concentration for IFN‐γ, IL‐10, IL‐6, IL‐8 and TNF‐α are pg/mL. Concentration of CD206 and CD163 are mg/L.