Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 7;11:291–298. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S224660

Table 1.

Distribution And Comparison Of Basic And Clinical Demographic Characteristics Of Patients With Hypospadias Between The Two Groups

Characteristics Silicone gel (n = 32) Vaseline (n = 32) P value
Age, year (µ ± SD) 2.56 ± 1.04 2.91 ± 1.44 0.262
Education Status of Parents, n (%)
 Illiterate 2 (6.3) 4 (12.5) 0.744
 Under Diploma 10 (31.3) 7 (21.9)
 Diploma 11 (34.4) 12 (37.5)
 Academic 9 (28.1) 9 (28.1)
Socioeconomic Status, n (%)
 Poor 9 (28.1) 12 (37.5) 0.314
 Moderate 17 (53.1) 11 (34.4)
 Good 6 (18.8) 9 (28.1)
Previous Hypospadias, n (%)
 Yes 0 (0) 0 (0)
 No 32 (100) 32 (100)
Type of Hypospadias, n (%) 0.881
 Distal 24 (75.0) 24 (75.0)
 Midshaft 4 (12.0) 5 (15.6)
 Proximal 4 (12.0) 3 (9.4)
Chordee, n (%) 0.774
 Yes 9 (28.1) 7 (21.9)
 No 23 (79.9) 25 (78.1)
Surgical Technique, n (%) 0.999
 MAGPI 25 (78.1) 24 (75.0)
 Snodgrass 7 (21.9) 8 (25.0)

Abbreviation: MAGPI, Meatal Advancement and Glanuloplasty Incorporated.