Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2018 Jun 18;128:255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.020

Table 2.

Within-person comparison of quantitative dietary characteristics (adjusted mean and 95% CI1) in relation to whether or not plain water was mentioned in the recall, NHANES 2005–2012.

Men Water day minus Women Water day minus

no water day,
p2 value

no water day,
p2 value
Plain water
reported in the
24-h recall
Plain water NOT
reported in the
24-h recall
Plain water
reported in the
24-h recall
Plain water NOT
reported in the
24-h recall

n 1875 1875 1479 1479
Total water3, g 3019 (2935, 3103) 2629 (2528, 2731) 390 (289, 491) 2416 (2341, 2491) 1903 (1830, 1977) 513 (443, 582)
< 0.0001 < 0.0001
24-h plain water, g 781 (737, 826) 0 704 (651, 757) 0
24-h food amount, g 1021 (990, 1051) 1001 (970, 1031) 20 (−19, 59) 800 (776, 824) 799 (764, 834) 1.0 (− 36, 38)
P = 0.3 P = 0.9
24-h beverage amount, g 1739 (1659, 1818) 2168 (2060, 2276) − 429 (− 529, − 330) 1292 (1230, 1353) 1497 (1424, 1571) − 206 (− 286, −125)
P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001
24-h energy intake, kcal 2485 (2410, 2559) 2557 (2485, 2629) − 72 (− 152, 8) 1786 (1727, 1846) 1811 (1749, 1874) −25 (−81, 31)
P = 0.08 P = 0.4
24-h food only energy, kcal 1976 (1915, 2037) 1942 (1881, 2003) 34 (−34, 102) 1458 (1403, 1512) 1440 (1379, 1500) 18 (−41, 77)
0.3 P = 0.5
24-h beverage only energy, kcal 508 (479, 537) 615 (572, 657) − 106 (− 147, − 65) 329 (312, 346) 372 (349, 394) −43 (−69, −16)
< 0.0001 P = 0.002
Alcoholic beverage energy, kcal 137 (115, 159) 181 (145, 217) −44 (−74, −13) 50 (37, 62) 51 (38, 64) − 1.5 (−15, 13)
P = 0.005 P = 0.8
Coffee, Tea beverage energy, kcal 49 (41, 57) 59 (49, 69) − 10 (− 19, − 1.0) 38 (32, 44) 54 (46, 62) − 16 (− 23, − 8)
P = 0.03 < 0.0001
Sweetened beverages and juice drinks energy, kcal 191 (174, 208) 221 (200, 242) − 29 (− 47, − 12) 124 (115, 134) 136 (123, 149) −11 (− 24, 2.2)
P = 0.005 P = 0.1
Fruit and vegetable juices energy, kcal 33 (28, 39) 44 (38, 50) − 11 (− 16, − 5) 31 (25, 37) 38 (32, 44) −6 (−13, 0.2)
P = 0.0001 P = 0.06
Dairy beverages energy, kcal 81 (73, 90) 92 (79, 104) − 10 (− 23, 2.5) 62 (53, 71) 69 (55, 82) −7 (−21, 8)
P = 0.1 P = 0.3
EI/BEE4 1.38 (1.34, 1.42) 1.42 (1.38, 1.46) − 0.04 (−0.08, 0.006) 1.26 (1.22, 1.31) 1.28 (1.24, 1.33) −0.02 (− 0.06, 0.02)
P = 0.1 P = 0.3
1

Estimates are adjusted means (i.e., predicted margins) and 95% confidence intervals associated with an indicator for whether it was a recall day with or without water. The multiple linear regression models included each dietary characteristic as a continuous dependent variable, and dummy variables for week day of recall (week day vs. weekend) and mode of recall administration (in-person vs. telephone), and a separate dummy variable for each individual in the study to allow individual-intercepts, as independent variables.

2

P-values obtained from Wald’s F-tests. Actual p values are presented. The multiple comparison adjusted p value for significant differences < 0.004.

3

Total water is the sum of water in foods, beverages, and plain water.

4

EI/BEE is the ratio of reported energy intake to computed basal energy expenditure, used as a measure of plausibility of the self-reported dietary intake data.