Table 2.
Clinical and pathological parameters of colorectal carcinomas with double somatic mismatch repair gene mutation/alteration.
Case ID | Age | Gender | Tumor location | Dominant histology | Histologic grade | Tumor-infiltrating-lymphocytes / high-power-field | Peritumoral lymphoid aggregates | pT (or ypT*) | pN | pM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 80 | Female | Ascending | Conventional | Poorly differentiated | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2b | 0 |
2 | 65 | Male | Ascending | Medullary | 51 | 11 | 3 | 1b | 0 | |
3 | 52 | Female | Cecum | Conventional | Moderately differentiated | 7 | 2 | 4b | 1a | 0 |
4 | 68 | Female | Left colon | Conventional | Moderately differentiated | 7 | 0 | 4a | 1c | 0 |
5 | 48 | Male | Ascending | Conventional | Poorly differentiated | 3 | 3 | 4a | 2a | 0 |
6 | 59 | Female | Cecum | Conventional | Moderate | 5 | 7 | 4a | 2a | 0 |
7 | 60 | Male | Sigmoid | Conventional | Poorly differentiated | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 46 | Male | Transverse | Mucinous | Moderately differentiated | 7 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
9 | 35 | Female | Transverse | Mucinous | Moderately differentiated | 1 | 4 | 4a | 2b | 0 |
10 | 53 | Male | Sigmoid | Mucinous | Moderately differentiated | 19 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 61 | Male | Ascending | Signet Ring | Poorly differentiated | 0 | 13 | 3 | 1b | 0 |
12 | 53 | Male | Cecum | Conventional | Poorly differentiated | 32 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
13 | 41 | Male | Rectum | Conventional | Moderately differentiated | 4 | 0 | 2* | 1a | 0 |
14 | 31 | Male | Ascending | Conventional | Moderately differentiated | 3 | 15 | 3 | 2a | 0 |
15 | 61 | Male | Ascending | Conventional | Moderately differentiated | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
ypT. Case underwent standard neoadjuvant treatment.