Table 6.
Satisfaction with 12-month services among persons with a 12-month DSM-IV disorder that used CAM or other services
| Satisfied with CAM carea,b | Satisfied with other carec,b | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service groups | n (total) | n (unweighted) | % | se | n (unweighted) | % | Se |
| CAM (only alternative healers)d | 78 | 63 | 82.1 | 4.9 | ** | ** | ** |
| CAM (only alternative healers) and other cared | 130 | 106 | 78.3 | 4.9 | 98 | 75.6 | 5.0 |
| Total N (unweighted) | 208 | ||||||
Those reporting that they were ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ with the services provided by the CAM provider.
Satisfaction with services was assessed only in NCSR, Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Shenzhen, Peru, Medellin, Japan, Israel, New Zealand, Romania, Northern Ireland, Portugal, Poland, Murcia and Iraq (part-2 sample n = 49 373).
Those reporting that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the services of at least one other service provider (specialty mental health, general medical, human services).
Only includes those, who saw a CAM provider (i.e. an alternative healer) and were assessed about their satisfaction about this provider (those reporting online support groups and self-help groups not included).