Table 1.
Name | Notation | Technical description | Ecological description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gamma stability | γstb | Temporal stability of abundance of all plots within a study site | Ecosystem stability of a collection of local communities – at the metacommunity scale | |
Spatial synchrony | φ | The degree that plot‐level abundances align to one another through time within a study site | The level to which local communities vary similarly in certain years. Potentially influenced by heterogeneity of communities, populations, and/or physical conditions across communities | |
Spatial stabilisation |
|
The inverse of the among‐plot synchrony of local community abundance through time | The factor by which temporal stability is increased when moving from the community to the metacommunity scale | |
Alpha stability | αstb | Temporal variability of total plant abundance at the plot scale | Stability at the local community scale. Influenced by growth strategies of component species (Sp stb) and/or by the synchrony of different species abundance through time (φsp) | |
Species stability | Sp stb | Species‐level stability within a plot, first averaged over species within plots, then averaged over plots to obtain a single value for each study site | How variable individual species abundances are from year to year. Heavily influenced by growth strategies of dominant species | |
Species synchrony | φsp | The degree that species abundances align with other species’ abundance through time, averaged over plots to obtain a single value for each study site | Different species responding in different ways through time. Likely driven strongly by functional diversity among species within a community | |
Population synchrony | φpop | The degree that a species’ abundance through time within one plot aligns with its abundance in different plots. Averaged across species to obtain a single value for each study site | Different populations of the same species responding differently through time in different communities. Likely driven by genotypic heterogeneity, interspecific competition, and/or different physical environments among patches |
See Wang & Loreau (2014) for more detail about calculating variability metrics.