Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 19;86(5):1010–1021. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12691

Table 2.

Summary statistics and modelled relationships between brood hatch date and breeding success and pair migratory strategy across shag pairs where both the female and male were classified as resident or migrant. The expected numbers of attempts are the frequencies of pair migratory strategies given random pairing. Raw mean (±1 standard deviation) hatch date and breeding success of pairs comprising migrant or resident males and females are shown. β is the model‐estimated effect size for pair migratory strategy, with 95% confidence intervals. Models that included pair migratory strategy as an explanatory factor fitted significantly better than models without this factor (hatch date, LRT, χ2 = 147.0, p < .01; breeding success, LRT, χ2 = 10.7, p = .05)

Male strategy Female strategy No. of attempts Expected no. of attempts Hatch date Breeding success
Raw mean ±1 SD β [95% CI] Raw mean ±1 SD β [95% CI]
Resident Resident 35 30 36.6 ± 7.5 37.2 [34.0, 40.6] 2.3 ± 1.0 0.8 [0.62, 1.05]
Resident Migrant 14 19 48.4 ± 14.5 48.6 [42.7, 54.5] 1.6 ± 1.1 0.5 [0.07, 0.87]
Migrant Resident 11 16 41.0 ± 8.5 41.0 [34.8, 47.2] 1.6 ± 1.1 0.5 [0.03, 0.95]
Migrant Migrant 15 10 45.5 ± 9.0 45.6 [40.4, 50.7] 1.6 ± 1.0 0.5 [0.03, 0.87]