Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med. 2012 Jun 15;125(8):764–772. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.036

Table 3.

Scan Parameters and Dose Estimates

Total (n = 1277) 64-Slice MDCT (n = 713) 64-Slice DSCT (n = 220) 64-Slice DSCT: Indication-based Protocols (n = 90) 128-Slice DSCT: BMI-based Protocols (n = 254) P Value
Scan Parameters
Tube voltage, kVp
80 kVp, n (%) 18 (1.4) 1 (0.14) 3 (1.4) 0 (0) 14 (5.51) <.001
100 kVp, n (%) 150 (11.7) 7 (0.98) 25 (11.4) 6 (6.7) 112 (44.1) <.001
120 kVp, n (%) 1104 (86.5) 705 (98.9) 188 (85.5) 84 (93.3) 127 (50.0) <.001
140 kVp, n (%) 5 (0.4) 0 (0) 4 (1.8) 0 (0) 1 (0.39) .008
RGT, n (%) 1092 (85.5) 713 (100) 193 (87.7) 66 (73.3) 120 (47.2) <.001
ECTCM, n (%) 344 (26.9) 0 (0) 178 (80.9) 58 (64.4) 108 (42.5) <.001
ECG-PW, % 20.1 ± 14.2 0 (0) 22.9 ± 12.7 21.8 ± 12.8 15.3 ± 15.5 <.001
PGT, n (%) 225 (17.6) 0 (0) 26 (11.8) 24 (26.7) 175 (68.9) <.001
Axial, n (%) 75 (5.9) 0 (0) 26 (11.8) 24 (26.7) 25 (9.84) <.001
High-pitch helical, n (%) 150 (11.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 150 (59.1) <.001
AEC, n (%) 442 (34.6) 0 (0) 135 (61.4) 86 (95.6) 221 (87.0) <.001
Scan length, cm 16.3 ± 2.1 16.3 ± 1.7 16.1 ± 2.6 15.9 ± 2.6 16.8 ± 2.5 <.001
Dose Estimates
CTDIvol, mGy 58.1 (46.4–77.0) 70.5 (53.4–79.1) 56.3 (42.1–70.9) 46.2 (29.9–61.2) 25.9 (16.9–46.4) <.001
DLP, mGy × cm 724.0 (552.0–1010.0) 934.0 (664.0–1051.0) 729.0 (543.8–988.8) 584.0 (341.0–785.25) 239.0 (125.3–481.8) <.001
ED, mSv 10.4 (7.7–14.1) 13.1 (9.3–4.7) 10.2 (7.6–13.8) 8.2 (4.8–11.0) 3.3 (1.8–6.7) <.001

kVp = kilovolt-potential; RGT = retrospective gating; ECTCM = electrocardiogram-based tube current modulation; ECG-PW = electrocardiogram-based pulsing window; PGT = prospective triggering; AEC = automatic exposure control;CTDIvol = volume-weighted computed tomography dose index; mGy = milligray; DLP = dose-length-product; ED = effective dose estimate; mSv = millisievert.