Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;29(11):1049–1062. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23097

Table 1.

Statistically significant results of the whole subfield analyses: young participants

Seed ROI Significant target ROIs T—statistic t(28) p—FDR corrected
DG/CA4 CA3/2 9.01 <.0001
CA1 11.12 <.0001
Uncus 4.74 <.0001
Perirhinal cortex −4.03 .0122
Parahippocampal cortex 3.46 .0306
Retrosplenial cortex 2.24 .0499
CA3/2 DG/CA4 8.81 <.0001
Pre/parasubiculum 3.88 .0017
Uncus −5.57 <.0001
CA1 DG/CA4 10.31 <.0001
CA3/2 2.24 .0493
Subiculum 8.42 <.0001
Pre/parasubiculum −2.59 .0273
Uncus 3.41 .0045
Parahippocampal cortex 3.41 .0045
Subiculum CA1 8.21 <.0001
Pre/parasubiculum 7.16 <.0001
Entorhinal cortex 2.54 .0380
Perirhinal cortex 4.58 .0003
Retrosplenial cortex 2.33 .0489
Pre/parasubiculum CA3/2 3.95 .0011
CA1 −2.61 .0257
Subiculum 7.05 <.0001
Parahippocampal cortex 7.50 <.0001
Retrosplenial cortex 4.75 .0002
Uncus DG/CA4 4.77 .0002
CA3/2 −5.65 <.0001
CA1 3.25 .0068
Entorhinal cortex −3.71 .0027
Perirhinal cortex 2.98 .0106

Negative correlations are shown in italics.