Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 30;31(7):e13548. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13548

Table 3.

Perforation rates per study

Author (y) Treatment protocola

Perforation

n (%)

Initial/subsequent Inflation time (s) Inflation pressure (psi)
Perforation
Chuah (2008)17 30 1/33 (3%) Initial 60 + 30 12 + 12
Dobrucali (2004)22 30 − 35 − 35 1/42 (2.3%) Initial 60 15
Vaezi (1999)21 30 − 35 1/24 (4.2%) Initial 60 9 − 15
Moonen (2016)24, b 30 + 35 − 40 3/96 (3.1%) 2/96 (2%) Initial subsequent 60 + 60 5 + 8
Moonen (2016)24, b 35 4/13 (32%) Initial 60 + 60 5 + 8
Mikaeli (2004)5, b 35 – 40 − 40 3/62 (5%) Initial 10 10
No perforation
Tanaka (2010)18 30 0/55 60 + 60 + 60 3 − 4 + 4 − 5 + 5 − 7
Ghoshal (2001)19 30 − 30 0/10 60 10 − 15
Maris (2010)20 30 − 30 − 30 0/82 60 − 180 9
Smeets (2015)23 30 + 35 0/26 180 5
Mikaeli (2004)5, b 30 − 35 − 40 0/200 10 10
Not specified
Allescher (2001)6 35 − 40 120 8 − 10

Bold numbers represent the dilation where a perforation occurred.

−, Not specified; n, number; psi, pound‐force per square inch; s, seconds.

a

+ = predefined scheme of two dilations; − = a next dilation only in case of symptom recurrence.

b

Two different dilation protocols are used, which are presented separately.