Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;40(8):1294–1311. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12780

Table 2.

The clusters’ practical characteristics expressed in mean z scores

1: SD‐X 2: SD‐L 3: SD‐P 4: SE‐P 5: SE‐D 6: P‐X 7: P‐CE 8: P‐NL
healthy nutrition (1) −.705 −.503 .043 −.169 −.119 .584 .549 .227
level of smoking (1) .740 .293 −.0134,5 .0073,5 −.0243,4 −.1918 −.326 −.1426
alcohol consumption (1)* −.2052,3 −.2181,3 −.1431,2 .0638 −.074 .341 .274 .1104
frequency of doing sports (1) −.627 −.200 −.746 −.270 .439 7,8 .582 .394 5,8 .426 5,7
days walking at least 30 mins (1) −.1724 −.094 .2854 −.2491,3 .2257 .336 .1605,8 .1237
number of close friends (2) −.319 −.403 .225 −.155 .217 .452 .424 .127
friends on social networks (2) −.350 .401 8 −.773 −.0696,7 .631 −.0884,7 −.1214,6 .397 2
local advice obtainable (3) .393 −1.100 .457 .225 .284 .550 .382 −.957
sense of belonging to n'hood (3) .2604 −1.140 .404 7 .2471 .163 .516 .428 3 −.857
ability to borrow things in n'hood (3) .313 −.957 .107 .245 .378 .651 .395 −.695
perceived n'hood safety (3) −.172 −.235 −.945 .2055,7,8 .2524,7 .363 .2624,5 .1874
importance of local friends (3) .318 −1.120 .468 .231 .191 .553 .438 −.941
willingness to improve n'hood (3) .027 −1.020 −.037 .202 .143 .459 .409 −.236
proportion of local friends (3) .2453 .252 .313 1 .0286,7 .132 −.0314,7 .0204,6 −.423
intention to stay in n'hood (3) .2844,7 −.896 .421 .2501 .036 .343 7 .315 1,6 −.755
regular talking to neighbours (3) .296 −1.120 .360 .232 .221 .520 .408 −.911
sense of civic duty (4) −.790 −.619 .293 .340 −.709 .605 .550 .250
perceived political qualification (4) −.695 −.490 5 −.179 .281 −.517 2 .640 .527 8 .577 7
effort of political engagement (4) .411 .119 .216 −.038 .046 −.2827,8 −.306 6,8 −.322 6,7
informed about politics (4) −.696 −.455 5 .1876 .467 −.474 2 .2103 .0728 .0667
interest in politics (4) −.874 −.605 −.004 .298 −.638 .719 .642 .635
perceived benefit in voting (4) −.553 5 −.390 .374 4,6 .386 3,6 −.545 1 .424 3,4 .261 .163
intention to vote (4) −1.280 −.750 .493 4,7 .527 3,7 −.685 .572 .509 3,4 .411
member of organisation (5) −.519 2 −.479 1 −.312 −.2505 −.2174 .500 1.500 .032
volunteering (5) −.306 4,6 −.2603,4,6 −.2532 −.301 1,2,6 −.183 −.2921,2,4 2.380 −.027
participation in arts activities (6) −.814 −.2683,4 −.1762,4 −.2162,3 .170 .486 7 .484 6 .404
attendance of art events (6) −.916 −.217 −.835 −.311 .408 .625 .561 .637
visits to historic sites (6) −.760 −.487 −.511 −.337 .097 .843 .742 .605
visits to museums/galleries (6) −.591 −.430 4 −.504 4 −.466 2,3 −.093 .935 .766 .626
internet use (7) −.668 .224 −1.640 .383 .477 .311 .296 .526
news consumption (7) −.610 .292 −.489 −.039 .038 .532 .450 .465
TV consumption (7) .515 .108 .767 .023 −.2216 −.2695,7 −.318 6 −.428
Frequency 10% 12% 13% 13% 15% 14% 9% 14%

clusters in columns: Social Disengagement ‐ Extensive (SD‐X), Local (SD‐L), Physical (SD‐P); Selective Engagement ‐ Political (SE‐P), Digital (SE‐D); Participation ‐ Extensive (P‐X), Civically Engaged (P‐CE), Non‐Local (P‐NL) · notes: All pairwise differences are statistically significant at p ≤ .05, except those pairs that are indicated in superscript above. Reading example for first row, first column: the score distribution of health nutrition for SD‐X is statistically identical to that of cluster 6 (SE‐D). Scores larger than +/‐ .3 are underlined. *Alcohol consumption not used in clustering.