Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 10;25(4):1395–1408. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14551

Table 1.

Multiple linear regression analyses on the effects of temperature (°C) and absorbance (water color, a 420, m−1) on response variables (lm[response variable ~ water temperature + absorbance]). N indicates the number of lakes included (differ because of data availability, see methods) and LN that the response variable was ln‐transformed prior to analysis. D is the direction of change, zeros indicating nonsignificant relationships. A positive skewness in length/age represents a higher proportion of small/young individuals. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, nonsignificant results in bold). In no case was there a significant interaction between temperature and absorbance

Response variable Temperature Absorbance R 2
D F D F

Fish biomass production (LN)

N = 46

F(1,43) = 5.27* F(1,43) = 10.59** 0.29

Population biomass (LN)

N = 52

F(1,49) = 6.01* 0 F (1,49) = 2.96 0.16

Population abundance (LN)

N =52

0 F (1,49) = 2.18 0 F (1,49) = 0.99 0.06

Mean length (LN)

N = 49

F(1,46) = 8.51** 0 F (1,46) = 1.41 0.19

Skewness (positive) in length

N = 49

+ F(1,46) = 16.76*** 0 F (1,46) = 0.08 0.27

Mean predicted age (LN)

N = 46

F(1,43) = 14.62*** + F(1,43) = 4.23* 0.29

Skewness (positive) in age

N  = 42

+ F(1,39) = 15.91*** 0 F (1,39) = 0.0084 0.29

Length‐at‐age 1 (LN)

N = 49

+ F(1,45) = 4.83* F(1,45) = 7.48** 0.20

Length‐at‐age 6 (LN)

N = 49

0 F (1,45) = 0.05 F(1,45) = 28.29*** 0.39

Length‐specific growth rate at 170 mm body length (LN)

N = 49

0 F (1,46) = 0.61 F(1,46) = 6.86* 0.15