Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;63(6):498–506. doi: 10.1111/jir.12597

Table 4.

Comparison KS‐B and GC

KS‐B GC Mean difference Effect size2
N M 1 SD 1 N M 1 SD 1
Intelligence TIQ 18 55.6 10.1 22 66.6 13.7 −11.0 −.92
Executive functioning IED 17 6.8 2.4 20 7.0 2.4 −.2 −.09
Key search 17 4.9 4.5 20 3.8 4.4 1.1 .25
Zoo map 1 16 −2.4 6.0 19 −1.3 4.7 −1.1 −.21
Zoo map 2 16 2.8 6.1 19 3.2 5.4 −.4 −.07
Memory RAVLT immediate recall 18 37.4 10.1 21 33.5 11.0 3.9 .38
RAVLT delayed recall 17 6.5 3.4 20 6.2 3.2 .3 .09
PRM 17 8.1 2.9 20 9.7 1.9 −1.6 −.68
PAL 17 5.6 1.9 20 6.6 1.6 −1.0 −.59
Social cognition ToM test‐R 16 25.4 6.0 21 24.8 5.6 .6 .11
Visuoconstruction Beery VMI 18 13.7 3.6 18 19.1 4.9 −5.4 −1.29
Beery Visual 18 17.2 4.1 18 21.6 4.5 −4.4 −1.05
Beery Motor 18 14.9 6.3 18 21.1 5.3 −6.2 −1.10
1

Raw performance scores.

2

Cohen's d effect sizes of .2, .5 and .8 represent, respectively, a small, medium and large effect.

Key search, Zoo map 1 and Zoo map 2 are subtests of the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome; Beery VMI, Beery–Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual‐Motor Integration; IED, intra/extradimensional shift test (CANTAB); PAL, Paired Associates Learning test (CANTAB); PRM, Pattern Recognition Memory test (CANTAB); RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; ToM test‐R, Theory of Mind test‐Revised; TIQ, total intelligence quotient.