Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 18;31(4):396–404. doi: 10.1111/den.13352

Table 6.

Summary of primary and secondary outcome measurement results

SA (n = 60) SH (n = 62) P
Primary outcome measure
Efficacy rate, % (n) 91.7 (55) 88.7 (55) <0.001a
En bloc complete resection 100.0 (60) 96.8 (60) 0.496b
Additional counts of injection
0 83.3 (50) 83.9 (52) 0.994c
1 8.3 (5) 6.5 (4)
≥2 8.3 (5) 9.7 (6)
Secondary outcome measures
Mucosal resection ease, % (n)
Extremely easy 38.3 (23) 33.9 (21) 0.678c
Easy 46.7 (28) 51.6 (32)
Ordinary 13.3 (8) 9.7 (6)
Difficult 1.7 (1) 4.8 (3)
Mucosal elevation shape, % (n)
Steep 66.7 (40) 59.7 (37) 0.426c
Gentle elevation 33.3 (20) 40.3 (25)
No elevation 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0)
Unable to determine 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0)
Time required for mucosal resection (min)
Mean (SD) 39.2 (26.4) 36.2 (22.4) 0.847c
Injection volume (mL)
Mean (SD) 23.3 (11.7) 24.5 (11.6) 0.506c
a

Hypothesis test that the lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in efficacy rate does not fall below the non‐inferiority margin (difference in the efficacy rate: 3.0%; 95% CI, −9.35% to 15.26%; non‐inferiority margin, −16.8%).

b

Fisher's exact test.

c

Wilcoxon two‐sample test.

SA, sodium alginate; SD, standard deviation; SH, sodium hyaluronate.