Table 4.
Jaccard's Distance | Family | Species | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parametric coefficients | Estimate | SE | z‐value | p | Estimate | SE | t‐value | p |
Intersect | 0.610 | 0.058 | 10.42 | <2 × 10−16 *** | 0.731 | 0.052 | 14.123 | <2 × 10−16 *** |
TISSUE | 0.034 | 0.021 | 1.596 | 0.111ns | 0.031 | 0.019 | 1.622 | 0.106ns |
SOIL | 0.067 | 0.022 | 2.987 | 0.003** | 0.060 | 0.020 | 2.992 | 0.003** |
Smooth terms | edf | F‐value | p | edf | F‐value | p | ||
s(day): BEAD | 1.000 | 7.411 | 0.007** | 1 | 13.550 | 2.6 × 10−4 *** | ||
s(day): TISSUE | 2.205 | 21.612 | 5.5 × 10−10 *** | 2.455 | 26.190 | 3.3 × 10−12 *** | ||
s(day): SOIL | 2.032 | 16.302 | 1.2 × 10−7 *** | 1.381 | 31.240 | 1.5 × 10−8 *** |
Percentage Matching | Family | Species | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parametric coefficients | Estimate | SE | z‐value | p | Estimate | SE | t‐value | p |
Intersect | 0.520 | 0.068 | 7.685 | 1.2 × 10−13 *** | 0.303 | 0.057 | 5.277 | 2.1 × 10−7 *** |
TISSUE | −0.052 | 0.032 | −1.634 | 0.103 ns | −0.048 | 0.026 | −1.839 | 0.067 ns |
SOIL | −0.098 | 0.033 | −2.997 | 0.003** | −0.094 | 0.027 | −3.514 | 4.9 × 10−4 *** |
Smooth terms | edf | F‐value | p | edf | F‐value | p | ||
s(day): BEAD | 1 | 5.565 | 0.019* | 1 | 17.270 | 3.9 × 10−5 *** | ||
s(day): TISSUE | 2.315 | 26.032 | 2.9 × 10−12 *** | 2.458 | 34.130 | 7.7 × 10−16 *** | ||
s(day): SOIL | 2.173 | 23.066 | 1.2 × 10−10 *** | 1.822 | 28.600 | 4.0 × 10−9 *** |
Extractions were performed from the ethanol used to preserve five unprocessed freshwater macroinvertebrate bulk samples and subsampled on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 14 after field sampling, using three DNA extraction methods (BEAD, TISSUE and SOIL). For each model, we provide the parameter estimates, standard errors (SE) and statistical significance of parametric terms, and the effective degrees of freedom (edf) and approximate significance of smooth terms. The shape of the smooth terms is provided in Figure 4. The matrix used to build the models excluded rare species with a percentage read count <0.01% from each sample; models build using alternative criteria for dealing with rare species are given in Tables S7 and S8.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.05.
p > 0.05.