Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;10:5124. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13109-1

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Differences in short-term thermal sensitivity across taxonomic groups. a Comparison of the intra-specific thermal sensitivity (E¯S) for growth (green triangles) and metabolic fluxes (purple circles). Error bars represent 95% CIs. CIs for growth rate thermal sensitivity fall within those for metabolic fluxes, and each sit above 0.65 eV (dotted line) for both archaea and bacteria (bacteria growth E¯S = 0.88 eV, n = 416; bacteria flux E¯S = 0.82 eV, n = 28; archaea growth E¯S = 0.95 eV, n = 82; archaea flux E¯S = 1.01 eV, n = 20). b Density plot of flux ES values for archaea and bacteria. c Density plot of growth rate ES values for archaea and bacteria. d Density plot of ES values for respiration rate TPCs in autotrophic eukaryotes, showing comparatively lower mean thermal sensitivity than those of the distributions for prokaryotes (E¯S=0.67 eV, n = 381). Source data are provided as a source data file