Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;9:16567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52951-7

Table 4.

Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy across tertiles of dietary patterns’ scores.

Cases/non-casesa Model 1 p for trend Model 2 p for trend Model 3 p for trend
Alcohol and fish 0.02 0.041 0.040
Tertile 1 (low) 91/100 Reference Reference Reference
Tertile 2 87/103 0.95 (0.61–1.48) 0.98 (0.62–1.56) 1.04 (0.64–1.68)
Tertile 3 (high) 108/85 1.78 (1.11–2.86)* 1.83 (1.07–3.13)* 1.85 (1.06–3.22)*
Traditional 0.404 0.62 0.969
Tertile 1 (low) 98/92 Reference Reference Reference
Tertile 2 93/99 1.09 (0.69–1.70) 1.12 (0.70–1.77) 1.16 (0.72–1.87)
Tertile 3 (high) 95/97 1.23 (0.76–1.99) 1.14 (0.68–1.89) 1.00 (0.59–1.70)
Coarse cereals 0.004 0.001 0.005
Tertile 1 (low) 87/104 Reference Reference Reference
Tertile 2 96/94 1.44 (0.93–2.25) 1.54 (0.97–2.45) 1.55 (0.96–2.50)
Tertile 3 (high) 103/90 1.95 (1.24–3.07)* 2.22 (1.37–3.60)* 2.05 (1.24–3.39)*

aCases with gastric mucosal atrophy/non-cases in tertiles.

Model 1: adjusted for age and gender.

Model 2: further adjusted for year of education, residence, marital status, occupation, income, BMI (body mass index), smoking and drinking.

Model 3: further adjusted for H. pylori infection, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of taking anticoagulants and total energy intake.

*p < 0.05.