Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;131(21):550–557. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-1523-4

Table 2.

Overview of the level of evidence of non-pharmacological methods in the management of low back pain. If the levels of evidence were explicitly reported in the guidelines they were extracted and are mentioned in this table

Intervention Guidelines Level of evidence
Self-management
Advice to stay active: maintaining usual levels of daily activity despite pain, including work [37] Denmark [37]a,b Low
Germany [40] Good to weak
UK [36] Moderate to very low
USA_ACP [38]a,b Not reported
USA_ICSI [39]a,b Moderate
Patient education: regarding health literacy, competencies, and adaptation of behavior [37] Denmark [37]a,b Very low
Germany [40] Good to weak
UK [36] Moderate to very low
USA_ACP [38]a,b Not reported
USA_ICSI [39]a,b High to moderate
Manual therapy
Spinal manual therapy: any mobilization or spinal manipulation technique [37] Denmark [37]a,b (in addition to usual care) Low
USA_ACP [38] Low
USA_ICSI [39]a,b Moderate to low
Manual therapy (spinal manipulation, mobilization or soft tissue techniques such as massage) in combination with exercise, with or without psychological therapy UK [36] High to very low
Massage USA_ACP [38]a,b Low
Exercise
(Supervised) exercise: individualized exercises or physical activity (e.g. back-specific strengthening, stretching, motor control exercise or mobilizing exercises and cardiovascular training) delivered by a trained healthcare professional [37] Denmark [37]a,b Low
USA_ACP [38]c Moderate, motor control therapy: low
Movement therapy, including educative approach Germany [40]b,c Good to weak
Group exercise UK [36] Moderate to very low
USA_ACP [38]c Moderate
Sport rehabilitation program or functional training (if the limitation in daily activities remains and the occupational rehabilitation is at risk) Germany [40]b,c Expert consensus
Tai chi USA_ACP [38]c Low
Yoga USA_ACP [38]c Low
Psychological therapy and/or interventions
Psychological therapy (using a cognitive behavioral approach) in combination with other treatments (e.g. exercise, manual therapy) or a multimodal program Germany [40]c Good to weak
UK [36] Moderate to very low
Cognitive behavioral therapy Germany [40]b (if psycho-social risk factors exist) Weak
USA_ACP [38]c Low
Operant therapy USA_ACP [38]c Low
Mindfulness-based stress reduction USA_ACP [38]c Moderate
Progressive relaxation Germany [40]c Weak
USA_ACP [38]c Low
Multidisciplinary programs
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation: combines a physical and psychological program UK [36] (if significant psychosocial obstacles to recovery exist or previous treatments have not been effective) Moderate to very low
USA_ACP [38]c Moderate
Return to work
Return to work programs (work or normal activities of daily living) UK [36] High to very low
Acupuncture
Acupuncture USA_ACP [38] Lowa, b, moderatec
USA_ICSI [39]a,b Low
Biofeedback, laser therapy
Electromyography biofeedback USA_ACP [38]c Low
Low-level laser therapy USA_ACP [38]c Low
Others
Superficial heat USA_ACP [38]a,b Moderate
USA_ICSI [39]a,b Moderate
Cryotherapy USA_ICSI [39]a,b Expert consensus

The guidelines used different modified versions of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE): Denmark (high, moderate, low, very low) [37], Germany (weak that refers to very low-low, good that refers to moderate-high) [40, 41], UK (high, moderate, low) [36], USA_ACP (high, moderate, low) [38], USA_ICSI (high, moderate, low, very low) [39]

USA_ACP American College of Physicians, USA_ICSI Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement

aFor acute low back pain patients

bFor subacute low back pain patients

cFor chronic low back pain patients