Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2019 Oct 16;87(12):1298–1314. doi: 10.1002/prot.25827

Table 2. Crystal structures, Atomic Models and SAXS data.

Stoichiometry (Stoic) and Porod Debye (PD) were calculated from the SAXS data. Flexibility (% Order) was calculated from what the number of amino acids (AA) modeled in the crystal structure (pdb) and what the number of AA present in the SAXS sample. Agreement to the SAXS data (χ2) was determined for the crystal structure, from a single model with missing AA added back (CHIMERA), and with the missing AA and potential flexible domains allowed to move using a version of CHARMM implemented in BILBOMD. The fit of the crystal within the shape was determined by eye.

Exp
SAXS
Stoic
AA-
saxs
sample
AA-
pdb
%
order
Predicted
Model
Sequence
vs SAXS
PD Crystal,
χ2
Full-
length
χ2
Fit to
SAXS,
χ2
Fit of
crystal
within
shape
S0949 1 151 139 92% +32/−10 4 1.64 1.41 yes
s0953 3:1 465 457 98% ok 3.6 12. 2.1 partly
s0957 1:1 327 318 97% ok 4 1.3 yes
s0968 1:2 or 2:2 466 484 96% ok 3.0 1.5 partly
s0975 1 343 281 82% ok 4 11 3.3 yes
s0980 2:2 338 290 86% −6aa 3.7 15 2.4 partly
s0981 3 674 610 90% −102 aa 3.7 2.84 3.24 partly
s0985 2 863 842 98% 0-42 vary 4 19/1.81 16 partly
s0987
conf1
1 496 381 94% −2-24 vary 4 51 52 0.94 yes
s0987
conf2
4 11 13 1.04
S0992 1 126 107 85% 0-16 vary 4 114 14 2.8 yes
s0999 2 3178 3083 97% ok 3.4 7. 3.9 partly
1

Addition of 5% tetramer for S0985 improved χ2 to 1.8.