Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;103(5):491–499. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13315

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Characteristic All patients (N = 83)
Outcome—no. (%)
Deceased 70 (84)
Survive 13 (16)
Sex—no. (%)
Male 46 (55)
Female 37 (45)
Age at time of allogeneic HSCT—y
Median (interquartile range) 54 (47‐62)
Range 18‐71
Prognostic class at time of AML diagnosis—no. (%)
Good risk 3 (4)
Intermediate risk 19 (23)
Poor risk 35 (42)
Very poor risk 26 (31)
WHO classification—no. (%)
AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities 33 (40)
AML with myelodysplasia‐related changes 9 (11)
Therapy‐related myeloid neoplasms 6 (7)
AML NOS 32 (39)
Other 3 (4)
HSCT donor—no. (%)
MUD (10/10) 53 (64)
SIB 28 (34)
CB 2 (2)
Conditioning regimen—no. (%)
Myeloablative 8 (10)
Reduced intensity 71 (85)
FLAMSA 4 (5)
Bone marrow blast count at time of relapse—% (N = 74)
Median (interquartile range) 25 (14‐52.25)
Range 0‐99
Time between allogeneic HSCT and relapse—wk
Median (interquartile range) 21 (12‐32)
Range 3‐187
Very early vs late relapse—no. (%)
Very early (<3 mo) 23 (28)
Late (≥3 mo) 60 (72)
Early vs late relapse—no. (%)
Early (<6 mo) 52 (63)
Late (≥6 mo) 31 (37)
Intention to treat—no. (%)
Curative 50 (60)
Palliative (best supportive care) 33 (40)

Four patients had an isolated central nervous system relapse.