Table 4.
Direction of change in scores on outcome measures
| Nature of change | T0 to T1 | T0 to T2 | T1 to T2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| EQ‐5D‐5L (T0–T1: n = 128; T0–T2: n = 61; T1–T2: n = 49) | ||||||
| Deterioration | 16 | 12.5 | 11 | 18.0 | 21 | 42.9 |
| Maintenance | 4 | 3.1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6.1 |
| Improvement | 108 | 84.4 | 50 | 82.0 | 25 | 51.0 |
| ASCOT SCT‐4 (T0–T1: n = 128; T0–T2: n = 59; T1–T2: n = 49) | ||||||
| Deterioration | 31 | 24.2 | 17 | 28.8 | 21 | 44.7 |
| Maintenance | 4 | 3.1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6.4 |
| Improvement | 93 | 72.7 | 42 | 71.2 | 23 | 48.9 |
| Barthel Index (T0–T1: n = 63) (not collected at T2) | ||||||
| Deterioration | 22 | 22.9 | — | — | — | — |
| Maintenance | 11 | 11.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Improvement | 63 | 65.5 | — | — | — | — |
| NEADL scale (T0–T1: n = 128; T0–T2: n = 64; T1–T2: n = 50) | ||||||
| Deterioration | 39 | 30.5 | 21 | 32.8 | 14 | 26.9 |
| Maintenance | 18 | 14.1 | 8 | 12.5 | 4 | 7.7 |
| Improvement | 71 | 55.5 | 35 | 54.7 | 34 | 65.4 |
| GHQ‐12 (T0–T1: n = 128; T0–T2: n = 62; T1–T2: n = 50) | ||||||
| Deterioration | 23 | 18.0 | 10 | 16.1 | 12 | 24.0 |
| Maintenance | 16 | 12.5 | 10 | 13 | 26.0 | |
| Improvement | 89 | 69.5 | 42 | 67.7 | 25 | 50.0 |