Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 23;37(11):2316–2324. doi: 10.1002/jor.24398

Table 1.

Patient Demographics

Primary (n = 29) All Revisions (n = 33) p Value Osteolysis, Loose Components Primary Laxity Pattern (n = 8) Progression of OA(PFJ Replacement, n = 3) Clinical Diagnosisof Fibrosis (n = 11)
Age (years, mean, SEM) 66 ± 2 68 ± 2 0.76 70 ± 3.2 67 ± 5 69 ± 6 65 ± 4
Gender 17 M:12 F 16 M:17 F 0.88 5 M:6 F 4 M:4 F 3 F 7 M:4 F
BMI (Mean, SEM) 33 ± 1 33 ± 1 0.97 34 ± 2 33 ± 2 30 ± 2 34 ± 2
Time from primary to revision surgery (years, mean, SEM) 10 ± 1 16 ± 3 6 ± 1 6 ± 3 8 ± 2
WOMAC pain scores (Mean, SEM) 30 ± 3 52 ± 7 0.001 65 ± 5 49 ± 4 34 ± 7 38 ± 4

No difference was found comparing age, gender, or body mass index (BMI) in revision versus primary patients, or comparing groups according to indication for revision (p = > 0.05, U test). Pain was significantly higher in revision versus primary patients (p = < 0.001).

SEM, standard error of mean.