Table 1.
Primary (n = 29) | All Revisions (n = 33) | p Value | Osteolysis, Loose Components | Primary Laxity Pattern (n = 8) | Progression of OA(PFJ Replacement, n = 3) | Clinical Diagnosisof Fibrosis (n = 11) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years, mean, SEM) | 66 ± 2 | 68 ± 2 | 0.76 | 70 ± 3.2 | 67 ± 5 | 69 ± 6 | 65 ± 4 |
Gender | 17 M:12 F | 16 M:17 F | 0.88 | 5 M:6 F | 4 M:4 F | 3 F | 7 M:4 F |
BMI (Mean, SEM) | 33 ± 1 | 33 ± 1 | 0.97 | 34 ± 2 | 33 ± 2 | 30 ± 2 | 34 ± 2 |
Time from primary to revision surgery (years, mean, SEM) | – | 10 ± 1 | – | 16 ± 3 | 6 ± 1 | 6 ± 3 | 8 ± 2 |
WOMAC pain scores (Mean, SEM) | 30 ± 3 | 52 ± 7 | 0.001 | 65 ± 5 | 49 ± 4 | 34 ± 7 | 38 ± 4 |
No difference was found comparing age, gender, or body mass index (BMI) in revision versus primary patients, or comparing groups according to indication for revision (p = > 0.05, U test). Pain was significantly higher in revision versus primary patients (p = < 0.001).
SEM, standard error of mean.