Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 23;37(11):2316–2324. doi: 10.1002/jor.24398

Table 2.

Synovial Fluid

Marker Primary (n = 21)Mean ± SEM (pg/ml) All Revisions (n = 24)Mean ± SEM (pg/ml) Primary vs. Revision TKA Osteolysis, Loose Components (n = 11)Mean ± SEM (pg/ml) Primary Laxity Pattern (n = 7)Mean ± SEM (pg/ml) Progression of OA (PFJ Replacement, n = 1)Mean ± SEM (pg/ml) Clinical Diagnosis of Fibrosis (n = 7)Mean ± SEM (pg/ml)
p Value Significance
GM‐CSF 0.5 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.3 <0.01 ** 1.8 ± 0.5 0.5 ± 0.2 0 1.6 ± 0.5
IL‐5 0.4 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.8 <0.001 *** 1.6 ± 0.4 4.1 ± 2.7 0 1.2 ± 0.4
IL‐8 80 ± 31 3,147 ± 1,552 <0.0001 **** 6,296 ± 3,996 777 ± 215 61 1,907 ± 829
IL‐10 0.8 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.4 <0.0001 **** 2.6 ± 0.9 0.8 ± 0.2 0 1.2 ± 0.6
CCL2 417 ± 38 5,285 ± 1,004 <0.0001 **** 5,902 ± 1,233 3233 ± 791 318 7,254 ± 2,824
CCL3 15.6 ± 3.3 177 ± 51 <0.0001 **** 285 ± 125 96 ± 16 16 142 ± 54
CCL4 69.6 ± 8 258 ± 54 <0.0001 **** 368 ±  ± 131 213 ± 39 36 192 ± 51
CCL13 42.5 ± 20 220 ± 76 <0.0001 **** 211 ± 92 67 ± 22 14 211 ± 92
Flt‐1 97.6 ± 12 1575 ± 612 <0.0001 **** 3,025 ± 1,512 391 ± 170 33 1,116 ± 443
VEGF 396.1 ± 46 1724 ± 268 <0.0001 **** 1,589 ± 220 1,081 ± 292 133 2,768 ± 680
VCAM‐1 105,613 ± 7,290 134,770 ± 7,434 <0.05 * 138,249 ± 10,066 151,817 ± 15,596 96,090 118,775 ± 13,418
ICAM‐1 862,890 ± 12,439 150,915 ± 24118 <0.05 * 189,061 ± 39,854 168,010 ± 58,990 31,383 101,851 ± 18,441

Levels of markers in synovial fluid. Comparing revision vs. primary synovial fluid all markers were significantly upregulated (p ≤ 0.05, U test). No significant differences were seen comparing different indications for revision surgery (p ≥ 0.05).

GM‐CSF, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor; ICAM‐1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; IL, interleukin; VCAM‐1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001.

****

p < 0.0001.