Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;29(8):1092–1100. doi: 10.1111/sms.13444

Table 5.

Questions and response from players from the intervention group (n = 255) about the implementation of the Adductor Strengthening Programme

Are the following staff members familiar with the Adductor Strengthening Programme? Yes No Don’t know Missing response  
Head and assistant coach 219 (85.9) 3 (1.2) 27 (10.6) 6 (2.4)  
Medical team 202 (79.2) 9 (3.5) 36 (14.1) 8 (3.1)  
Other coaches (fitness coach, goalkeeper trainer etc) 180 (70.6) 11 (4.3) 52 (20.4) 12 (4.7)  
How do you perceive the attitudes to the Adductor Strengthening Programme in the following groups? Positive Neutral Negative Don’t know Missing response
Head and assistant coach 126 (49.4) 88 (34.5) 4 (1.6) 23 (9.0) 14 (5.5)
Medical team 137 (53.7) 62 (24.3) 3 (1.8) 37 (14.5) 16 (6.3)
Players 63 (24.7) 128 (50.2) 33 (13.0) 15 (5.9) 16 (6.3)
Administration 46 (18.0) 64 (25.1) 3 (1.2) 128 (50.2) 14 (5.5)
Who has mainly initiated the program? Rate from 1 to 3, where 1 is the one who has initiated it the most. Most Second most Third    
Head coach 35 (15.7) 39 (23.1) 39 (25.5)    
Assistant coach 3 (1.3) 27 (16.0) 18 (11.8)    
Fitness coach 78 (35.0) 28 (16.6) 13 (8.5)    
Health professional 17 (7.6) 20 (11.8) 12 (7.8)    
Team captain 11 (5.0) 7 (4.1) 14 (9.1)    
Another player of the team 6 (2.7) 26 (15.4) 14 (9.1)    
The players of the team 65 (29.1) 18 (10.7) 19 (12.4)    
Don’t know 8 (3.6) 4 (2.3) 24 (15.7)    
Who has mainly been responsible for the quality of the Adductor Strengthening Programme? Rate from 1 to 3, where 1 is the one who had most. Most Second most Third    
Head coach 8 (3.7) 31 (18.4) 47 (31)    
Assistant coach 4 (1.8) 19 (11.2) 19 (12.5)    
Fitness coach 76 (35.2) 31 (18.4) 17 (11.2)    
Health professional 16 (7.4) 27 (16.0) 7 (4.6)    
Team captain 8 (3.7) 9 (5.3) 8 (5.3)    
Another player of the team 4 (1.9) 27 (16.0) 13 (8.6)    
The players of the team 89 (41.2) 19 (11.2) 15 (9.9)    
Don’t know 11 (5.1) 6 (3.6) 26 (17.1)