Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 28;66(7):739–758. doi: 10.1111/zph.12621

Table 6.

Seroprevalence of Cache Valley virus reported in human populations between 1956 and 2009 in 20 studies

Country/Regiona Sampling date Study design Population Positive/N Proportion positive (%) References
North America
Canada
Manitoba 2009 Prevalence Survey Suspected West Nile cases. 9/55 16.4 Dimitrova et al. (2011)
Saskatchewan 2009 Prevalence Survey Suspected West Nile cases. 9/216 4.2 Dimitrova et al. (2011)
Mexico
Chiapas & Tabasco 1969 Prevalence Survey Outpatients; Men in factories, prisons, and the army 1/46 2.2 Goldsmith et al. (1979)
Coatetelco 1961 Prevalence Survey Humans age 41–75 0/20 0 Scherer, Campillo‐Sainz, Dickerman, Diaz‐Najera, and Madalengoitia (1967)
Oaxaca 1969 Prevalence Survey Outpatients; Men in factories, prisons, and the army 13/493 2.6 Goldsmith et al. (1979)
Tlacotalpan 1961 Prevalence Survey Humans age 20–41 0/20 0 Scherer et al. (1967)
Tlacotalpan 1961 Prevalence Survey Humans age 41–75 7/18 38.9 Scherer et al. (1967)
Campeche, Quintana Roo & Yucatan 2007 Prevalence Survey Febrile patients 18/146b 12.3 Blitvich, Lorono‐Pino, et al. (2012)
USA
Alaska 1983–1986 Prevalence Survey General population 0/90 0 Walters, Tirrell, and Shope (1999)
California 1987 Prevalence Survey Outpatients; Outdoor workers 0/235 0 Campbell, Reeves, Hardy, and Eldridge (1992)
California 1988 Prevalence Survey Outpatients; Outdoor workers 0/118 0 Campbell et al. (1992)
Colorado 2008–2009 Prevalence Survey Rocky Mountain National Park Employees 2/60 3.3 Kosoy et al. (2016)
Florida 1960 Cross‐sectional Humans aged 1–15 living a reservation 2/5 40.0 Work (1964)c
Florida 1960 Cross‐sectional Humans age 16 + living in a reservation 12/60 20.0 Work (1964)c
Illinois 1964 Prevalence Survey General population 1/59 1.7 Kokernot et al. (1969)
Indiana 1989–1990 Prevalence Survey Hospital patients 36/2696 1.3 Heard (1997)
Indiana 1990–1993 Prevalence Survey Individuals with CNS infections 3/244 1.2 Heard (1997)
Indiana 1993–1994 Cross‐sectional Live birth cord samples 32/1088 2.9 Nowicki (1996)
Kentucky 1965 Prevalence Survey General population 3/55 5.5 Kokernot et al. (1969)
Kentucky 1966 Prevalence Survey General population 2/72 2.8 Kokernot et al. (1969)
Maryland 1962–1963 Prevalence Survey General population 9/180 5.0 Buescher et al. (1970)c
Tennessee 2008–2009 Prevalence Survey Great Smoky Mountain National Park Employees 2/75 2.7 Kosoy et al. (2016)
Utah 1956 Prevalence Survey Humans in the vicinity of the first CVV isolations 0/5 0 Holden and Hess (1959)
Virginia 1961 Prevalence Survey General population 33/176 18.7 Buescher et al. (1970)c
Wyoming 2010 Prevalence Survey Grand Teton National Park seasonal employees 5/160 3.1 Kosoy et al. (2016)
South America
Argentina
Buenos Aires, Mendoza & Tucumán 1961 Prevalence Survey Healthy males 20–40 years 4/175 2.3 Mettler, Parodi, and Casals (1963)
Córdoba & Litoral 1961–1963 Prevalence Survey General population 6/213 2.8 Sabattini et al. (1965)c
Córdoba 2004–2005 Prevalence Survey Outpatients 40/638 6.3 Tauro, Almeida, and Contigiani (2009)c
Guyana
Upper Takutu‐Upper Essequibo 1956 Prevalence Survey General population 4/18 22.2 Downs et al. (1961)c
Upper Takutu‐Upper Essequibo 1959 Prevalence Survey General population 4/8 50.0 Downs et al. (1961)c
Jamaica
Kingston, Portland, St. Andrew, St. James & St. Thomas 1963–1964 Prevalence Survey Children and adults; positive results were mainly children under 5 29/531 5.5 Belle, Grant and Griffiths (1966)
Portland, St. Andrew & St. Thomas 1963–1967 Prevalence Survey Humans age 5–15 0/25 0 Belle, King, Griffiths, and Grant (1980)
Portland, St. Andrew & St. Thomas 1963–1967 Prevalence Survey Humans age 15+ 5/77 6.5 Belle et al. (1980)
NRd 1989e Prevalence Survey Individuals with and without HTLV−1 antibodies 16/200 8.0 Murphy, Calisher, Figueroa, Gibbs, and Blattner (1989)
Trinidad
Port of Spain 1961e Prevalence Survey Field staff members of the Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory 4/11 36.4 Downs et al. (1961)c
Sangre Grande 1961e Prevalence Survey General population 15/46 32.6 Downs et al. (1961)c
a

Region is the state or province studied as described by the author.

b

Number of positive cases estimated from data provided in the study.

c

The antigenic test employed was developed using isolate BeAr 7272 (Buescher et al., 1970; Work, 1964), TR 20659 (Downs et al., 1961) and CbaAr‐ 426 (Sabattini et al., 1965), which have been reclassified as Maguari virus (Groseth et al., 2017). CVV and Maguari virus isolates were shown to be indistinguishable antigenically at the time of these studies (Casals & Whitman, 1960).

d

NR = data not recorded.

e

Publication date reported as study date was not available.