Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 26;75(3):413–420. doi: 10.1111/his.13883

Table 3.

Recommendations based on the pitfalls in the assessment of the depth of invasion in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Pitfalls Recommendations Examples, see Figure 2 
1. Recognition which invasive nest is deepest
  • In tumours ≤1 cm; totally embed the carcinoma

  • If still uncertain, cut at least two deeper levels on the block

A–C
2. Recognition whether or not there is in fact invasive growth and where it starts
  • See recommendations of pitfall 1

  • Tumours >1 cm; enclose one tissue block for every 0.5 cm of the carcinoma

B–F
3. Curved surface with two or more possible locations of the surface
  • Measure from the surface resulting in the least favourable depth of invasion

G
4. Carcinoma situated on the edge of the tissue block
  • Locate the carcinoma in the middle of the block if possible

H
5. Ulceration
  • Sample the carcinoma without ulceration. If not possible, measure from the floor of the tumour ulcer

I
6. Different measurement methods are used
  • Use the conventional method. Do not routinely use the alternative method until validated, but if used, state the method of measurement used in the pathology report

J

In case of doubt, if micro‐ or macroinvasive growth (FIGO stages IA or ≥IB) is present in the carcinoma after following the above recommendations, we advise consultation with an expert gynaecopathologist.