Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;42(7):1038–1046. doi: 10.1111/pace.13728

Table 3.

Patient‐based arrhythmia detection results

Asystole Bradycardia SRD HVR AF
Patients with episodes in Holter‐ECG 2 7 2 3 15
Patients with episodes detected by ICM 4 8 3 3 23
True positive (TP) patients 2 7 2 3 15
False positive (FP) patients 2 1 1 0 8
False negative (FN) patients 0 0 0 0 0
True negative (TN) patients 78 74 79 79 59
Sensitivity = TP/(TP+FN) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Specificity = TN/(TN+FP) 97.5% 98.7% 98.8% 100% 88.1%
Positive predictive value = TP/(TP+FP) 50.0% 87.5% 66.7% 100% 65.2%
Negative predictive value = TN/(TN+FN) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Accuracy = (TP+TN)/(TP+TN+FP+FN)  97.6% 98.8% 98.8% 100% 90.2%

Note. The analysis included 82 patients with adjudicated Holter findings and ICM data (see Appendix 1 for details).

Abbreviations: AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = electrocardiogram; ICM = insertable cardiac monitor; HVR = high ventricular rate; SRD = sudden ventricular rate drop.