Table 2.

TOJ, SJ, and TBW in ASC Children and Adolescents

		Sample		Sensorial Modality	Tasks	Findings	Commentaries
		ASC	NT
De Boer‐Schellekens, Eussen, & Vroomen [2013], De Boer‐Schellekens, Keetels, et al. [2013]	n	16	16	Bimodal (A‐V) handclap speech flash/beep	TOJa	Lower time sensitivity in ASC group	Small sample
	Age	19.3 (2.4)	19.3 (1.3)
	IQ	106.2 (14.1)	106.6 (8.4)			No differences between conditions
De Boer‐Schellekens, Eussen, and Vroomen [2013]	n	35	40	Visual	TOJ	Lower time sensitivity in ASC group
	Age	18.8 (2.1)	18.8 (1.3)
	IQ	103.2 (14.6)	107.9 (9.1)
Kwakye et al. [2011]	n	35	27	Visual	TOJ	No differences in visual thresholds
	Age	12.21 (2.7)	11.73 (2.4)	Auditory
	IQ	102.9 (18.7)	109.5 (10.8)	Bimodal		Less temporal sensitivity in auditory stimuli in ASC
						Larger TBW in ASC
Puts et al. [2014]	n	27	54	Tactile	TOJ	No differences on TOJ tasks between groups	Differences between groups in IQ
	Age	10.7 (1.015)	10.08 (1.28)
	IQ	103.14 (14.93)	117.33 (12.24)
Stevenson et al. [2014]	n	32	32	Bimodal flash‐beep, tool, syllable	TOJ	Wider TBW in ASC for speech stimuli No differences for flash‐beep and tool stimuli	Differences between groups in verbal IQ
	Age	11.8 (3.2)	12.3 (2.3)		SJb
	IQ	57.5 (8.4)	53.7 (8)
Wada et al. [2014]	n	10	10	Tactile	TOJ	Reduced temporal sensitivity in ASC	Small sample
	Age	11.8 (0.7)	11.7 (0.7)
	IQ	100.7 (6.5)	101.6 (2.4)			No detriment in performance when hands‐crossed in ASC
Noel et al. [2016]	n	26	26	Bimodal flash‐beep, tool, syllable	TOJ
	Age	12.3 (3.05)	11.6 (3.79)		SJ
	IQ	111.52 (14.73)	112.18 (7.56)			Wider TBW in ASC for speech stimuli. No differences in flash‐beep and tool
Foss‐Feig et al. [2010]	n	21	17	Bimodal flash‐beep	Flash‐beep illusion	Wider TBW in ASC
	Age	12.8 (2.61)	12.9 (2.2)
	IQ	108.45 (18.7)	107.19 (9.3)
Irwin et al. [2011]	n	13	13	Bimodal (A‐V)	Asynchrony	ASC sample performed similarly with mental age matched, but not with chronological age No differences between groups	Small sample
	Age	9.08	9.16
Bebko et al. [2006]	n	16	15 DD/16 NH	Bimodal (A‐V)	Preferential looking	ASC only showed preferential looking for asynchronous non‐linguistic events	Small sample
	Age	5.49 (0.51)	4.88 (0.72) DD/2.36 (0.68) NH
Greenfield et al. [2015]	n	29	29CA/29MA	Bimodal (A‐V)	Rubber hand illusion	ASC sample performed similarly with mental age matched, but not with chronological age
	Age	12.64 (1.9)	12.18 (1.78) CA/7.88 (1.39)
Grossman et al. [2015]	n	30	30	Bimodal (A‐V)	Eye‐tracking	Less gaze to in‐synch condition in ASC Less gaze time to mouth area in ASC
	Age	11:10 (1:4)	12:5 (0.11)
	IQ	104 (15.9)	109 (11.2)

^aTemporal order judgment.

^bSimultaneity judgment.