Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;29(10):1546–1562. doi: 10.1111/sms.13485

Table 2.

Data from tests assessing inhibitory control, declarative memory, and neuroelectric modulation of attention for resting football (RF), small‐sided walking football (SWF), and small‐sided real football (SRF)

Measure SRF SWF RF
Baseline Follow‐up Baseline Follow‐up Baseline Follow‐up
Inhibitory control performance
Accuracy (% correct): congruent trials 93.6 (78.9, 108.4) 94.8 (85.4, 104.2) 94.3 (80.1, 108.7) 96.2 (85.6, 107) 92.0 (74.3, 109.9) 95.5 (81.2, 110)
Accuracy (% correct): Incongruent trials 80.6 (59, 102.3) 86.2* (68.3, 104.2) 81.1 (58.2, 104) 85.8 (63.1, 108.6) 82.2 (61.8, 102.7) 89.5* (71.1, 108)
Response latency (ms): congruent trials 484 (351, 618) 498 (365, 632) 478 (362, 595) 477 (357, 597) 496 (361, 632) 524* (399, 650)
Response latency (ms): incongruent trials 561 (403, 720) 555 (406, 704) 543 (391, 696) 543 (425, 662) 563 (401, 726) 584 (440, 728)
Interference effect for accuracy 13.4 (9.9, 17) 8.6* (6.1, 11.2) 13.3 (10.2, 16.5) 10.3 (6.8, 13.9) 9.5 (6.4, 12.7) 6.0 (3.5, 8.6)
Interference effect for reaction time 77 (66, 89) 57* (48, 67) 65 (52, 79) 66 (59, 74) 67 (54, 81) 59 (46, 73)
Declarative memory performance
Acquisition pictures (% correct) 76.4 (47.1, 105.8) 51.5* (21.3, 81.8) 69.4 (38.2, 100.8) 50.3* (18.3, 82.4) 71.6 (40.7, 102.6) 49.1* (18.7, 79.6)
Neutral pictures (% correct) 98.2 (93.8, 102.7) 84.5* (64.1, 105) 94.5 (73.2, 116) 85.4* (58.6, 112.3) 98.1 (92.7, 103.7) 87.5* (83.6, 91.5)
Total pictures (% correct) 90.9 (80.4, 101.6) 68* (53.2, 82.9) 85.6 (66, 105.4) 67.8* (52.6, 83.1) 89.3 (78.7, 100.0) 68.5* (54.8, 82.3)
Neuroelectric modulation of attention
Amplitude Fz congruent trials (μV) 1.5 (−2.1, 5.1) 4.4*, # (−0.4, 9.2) 1.0 (−3.4, 5.4) 1.6 (−2.6, 5.8) 2.7 (−0.3, 5.7) 3.5 (−0.3, 7.3)
Amplitude Cz congruent trials (μV) 8.1 (1.1, 15.2) 9.5* (2.1, 17) 7.8 (1.2, 14.5) 7.7 (1.3, 14.2) 8.4 (2.4, 14.5) 8.1 (2.5, 13.8)
Amplitude Poz congruent trials (μV) 17.3 (7, 27.7) 17.5 (7.9, 27.2) 14.1 (4.7, 23.6) 15.0 (6.2, 23.9) 12.6 (4.4, 20.9) 13.2 (5.8, 20.7)
Amplitude Fz incongruent trials (μV) 2.1 (−1.9, 6.1) 4.7*, # , § (−0.4, 9.8) 1.5 (−4.2, 7.2) 2.0 (−2.6, 6.6) 4.0 (−0.4, 8.4) 3.3 (−1.3, 7.9)
Amplitude Cz incongruent trials (μV) 11.1 (2.1, 20.2) 11.7 (1.9, 21.5) 10.1 (1.5, 18.8) 9.9 (9.4, 10.5) 11.6 (5, 18.3) 10.5 (2.7, 18.4)
Amplitude Poz incongruent trials (μV) 16.3 (5.6, 27.1) 15.3 (5.4, 25.3) 14.1 (4.2, 24.1) 14.6 (5.4, 23.9) 12.9 (3.5, 22.4) 12.4 (4.8, 20.1)
Latency Fz congruent trials (ms) 499 (297, 701) 462* (324, 601) 503 (310, 697) 508 (335, 682) 446 (286, 607) 480 (336, 625)
Latency Cz congruent trials (ms) 494 (319, 669) 467 (346, 590) 508# (350, 667) 495 (331, 660) 446 (299, 593) 483 (318, 649)
Latency POz congruent trials (ms) 404 (292, 516) 396 (296, 497) 418 (299, 538) 406 (311, 502) 416 (312, 522) 403 (318, 490)
Latency Fz incongruent trials (ms) 508 (340, 677) 536 (403, 671) 514 (376, 653) 526 (361, 692) 517 (365, 671) 551 (437, 666)
Latency Cz incongruent trials (ms) 506 (428, 586) 489 (366, 612) 511 (403, 620) 500 (343, 658) 531 (416, 647) 528 (389, 668)
Latency POz incongruent trials (ms) 457 (327, 587) 439 (325, 554) 504 (359, 649) 438* (329, 548) 487 (372, 603) 400 (320, 561)

Data for inhibitory control and declarative memory are reported as raw mean values and 95% CI. Data for neuroelectric modulation of attention are reported as baseline‐corrected values from Figure 5.

*

Significant difference from baseline value.

#

Significant difference from RF.

§

Significant difference from SWF (P < 0.05).