Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;29(5):e01895. doi: 10.1002/eap.1895

Table 2.

Candidate disturbance model set tested in the additive and interactive analysis

Model group and set Model type Model predictors
Habitat only (HO)
1a N/A Habitat and Spatial Variables Only
Linear (LI)
2a additive NL + WL
2b interactive NL + WL + NL × WL
Linear and energy (LE)
3a additive NL + WL + WE
3b interactive NL + WL + WE + WE × NL + WE × WL
3c interactive NL + WL + WE + WE × NL + WE × WL + WE × NL × WL
Linear and forestry (LF)
4a additive AL + HU
4b interactive AL + HU + HU × AL
Cumulative (CU)
5a additive AL + WE + HU
5b interactive AL + WE + HU + HU × AL + HU × WE
5c interactive AL + WE + HU + HU × AL + HU × WE + WE × AL + HU × WE × AL
Disturbance area (DA)
6a additive all disturbances summed (combined AL, WE, HU)

All models include habitat and spatial predictors selected for each landbird species. Stressor definitions: NL, narrow linear (percent cover of seismic lines); WL, wide linear (percent cover of pipelines, powerlines, all roads); AL, all linear (percent cover of narrow and wide linear combined); HU, harvest unit (percent cover harvest units with harvest activity <20 yr old); WE, wells (percent cover with bitumen, oil, and gas wells).