Table 1.
Authors | Blood sampling (after transplantation [Tx]) | Patient numbers | Cell type | Relation with rejection |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cano‐Romero et al48 | Pre kidney Tx: acute rejection vs no rejection | 18 vs 188 | CD4+CXCR5+CCR7−PD‐1+ | Higher |
Zhang et al50 | Liver Tx: during acute rejection vs no rejection | 12 vs 20 |
%Tfh1 %Tfh2 %Tfh17 serum IL‐21 |
No Higher Lower Higher |
Baan et al51 | Heart Tx: during acute rejection vs no rejection | 13 vs 44 | IL‐21 in biopsy | Higher |
de Leur et al52 | Kidney Tx: during rejection | 15 | IL‐21+Bcl‐6+ cells in biopsy | Present |
van Besouw et al53 |
Pre kidney Tx: early acute rejection vs no rejection 6 months: late rejection vs no rejection |
15 vs 20 13 vs 33 |
Number of donor‐reactive IL‐21 producing PBMC Number of donor‐reactive IL‐21 producing PBMC |
Higher Higher |
Shi et al54 | 1‐3 years post kidney Tx: chronic AMBR vs no ABMR | 24 vs 18 |
CD4+CXCR5+ CD4+CXCR5+PD‐1+ CD4+CXCR5+ICOS+ serum IL‐21 |
Higher Lower Comparable Comparable |
Chen et al55 | Kidney Tx: chronic ABMR vs no ABMR | 40 vs 48 |
%CD4+CXCR5+ICOS+ %Tfh17%Tfh2 CD4+CXCR5+ in biopsy CD4+CXCR5+FoxP3+ in biopsy |
Comparable Higher Higher Comparable Lower |
Chenouard et al56 | Kidney Tx: tolerance (Tol) vs stable graft function | 8 vs 14 |
%CD4+CD45RA−CXCR5+ %CD4+CD45RA−CXCR5+PD‐1+ICOS1+ Number CD4+CD45RA−CXCR5+ Number CD4+CD45RA−CXCR5+PD‐1+ICOS1+ |
Tol: lower Tol: lower Comparable Comparable |