Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 8;94(5):407–414. doi: 10.1111/tan.13671

Table 1.

Tfh cells and IL‐21 in relation to human allograft rejection and tolerance

Authors Blood sampling (after transplantation [Tx]) Patient numbers Cell type Relation with rejection
Cano‐Romero et al48 Pre kidney Tx: acute rejection vs no rejection 18 vs 188 CD4+CXCR5+CCR7PD‐1+ Higher
Zhang et al50 Liver Tx: during acute rejection vs no rejection 12 vs 20

%Tfh1

%Tfh2

%Tfh17

serum IL‐21

No

Higher

Lower

Higher

Baan et al51 Heart Tx: during acute rejection vs no rejection 13 vs 44 IL‐21 in biopsy Higher
de Leur et al52 Kidney Tx: during rejection 15 IL‐21+Bcl‐6+ cells in biopsy Present
van Besouw et al53

Pre kidney Tx: early acute rejection vs no rejection

6 months: late rejection vs no rejection

15 vs 20

13 vs 33

Number of donor‐reactive IL‐21 producing PBMC

Number of donor‐reactive IL‐21 producing PBMC

Higher

Higher

Shi et al54 1‐3 years post kidney Tx: chronic AMBR vs no ABMR 24 vs 18

CD4+CXCR5+

CD4+CXCR5+PD‐1+

CD4+CXCR5+ICOS+

serum IL‐21

Higher

Lower

Comparable

Comparable

Chen et al55 Kidney Tx: chronic ABMR vs no ABMR 40 vs 48

%CD4+CXCR5+ICOS+

%Tfh17%Tfh2

CD4+CXCR5+ in biopsy

CD4+CXCR5+FoxP3+ in biopsy

Comparable

Higher

Higher

Comparable

Lower

Chenouard et al56 Kidney Tx: tolerance (Tol) vs stable graft function 8 vs 14

%CD4+CD45RACXCR5+

%CD4+CD45RACXCR5+PD‐1+ICOS1+

Number CD4+CD45RACXCR5+

Number CD4+CD45RACXCR5+PD‐1+ICOS1+

Tol: lower

Tol: lower

Comparable

Comparable