Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;17(3):215–225. doi: 10.1002/msc.1403

Table 3.

Changes within, and differences between, study groups at week 26 for secondary outcomes not reflecting disease activity when analysed per protocol

Baseline values Change at week 26 vs. baseline (95% CI)
HAQ (range 0–3, best to worse) Intervention group (n = 29) 1.1 (0.6) −0.15 (−0.35, 0.05)
Control group (n = 33) 1.1 (0.6) −0.42 (−0.67, 0.16)
Group difference (95% CI) −0.26 (−0.59, 0.06)
RAID (range 0–10, best to worse) Intervention group (n = 29) 4.7 (2.2) −1.31 (−2.31, −0.31)
Control group (N = 33) 5.5 (1.7) −1.17 (−2.12, −0.22)
Group difference (95% CI) 0.14 (−1.21, 1.49)
PASS (yes, %) Intervention group (N = 29) 41% (12/29) 28% (5, 50)
Control group (n = 33) 33% (11/33) 27% (5, 50)
Group difference (95% CI) 0 (−31, 31)
BMQ‐necessity (range 5–25, with 25 being the highest level of necessity) Intervention group (n = 29) 18.7 (4.3) 0.68 (−1.04, 2.40)
Control group (n = 33) 19.3 (3.2) 0.26 (−1.39, 1.96)
Group difference (95% CI) 0.39 (−2.73, 1.95)
BMQ‐concerns (range 5–25, with 25 being the highest level of concerns) Intervention group (n = 29) 13.9 (4.8) −1.14 (−2.82, 0.54)
Control group (n = 33) 14.3 (3.37) −0.71 (−1.78, 0.36)
Group difference (95% CI) −0.43 (−1.48, 2.34)
Patient satisfaction (range 0–10, worst to best) Intervention group (n = 29) 8.3 (1.9) 1.00 (0.18, 1.82)
Control group (n = 33) 8.3 (1.8) 0.55 (0.04, 2.21)
Group difference (95% CI) 0.45 (−1.37, 0.46)
EQ‐5D (−1 to +1 (best health) Intervention group (n = 29) 0.50 (0.32) 0.05 ([−0.12] – 0.21)
Control group (n = 33) 0.48 (0.33) 0.12 ([−0.04] – 0.28)
Group difference (95% CI) −0.08 (−0.15, 0.30)

BMQ: Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire; CI: confidence interval; EQ‐5D: EuroQol‐5D; HAQ: Health assessment questionnaire; PASS: patient acceptable symptom state, RAID: Rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease.