Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;18:107. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0728-0

Table 5.

E, H and E/H ratio of cortical bone obtained by nanoindentation tests, mean ± SD

SED EX12 EX16 EX20
Ct.L
 EL (GPa) 23.57 ± 3.85 24.15 ± 3.85 25.04 ± 3.84 20.71 ± 3.03a,b,c
 HL (GPa) 1.01 ± 0.21d 1.27 ± 0.49a,c,d 1.01 ± 0.17 0.92 ± 0.08
 EL/HL 24.10 ± 4.67b 21.62 ± 7.30 25.03 ± 3.26b 22.62 ± 3.01
Ct.T
 ET (GPa) 19.69 ± 2.97 21.56 ± 2.29a,d 20.97 ± 1.83a,d 18.74 ± 1.67
 HT (GPa) 0.88 ± 0.20c,d 0.89 ± 0.24d 0.97 ± 0.19d 0.74 ± 0.08
 ET/HT 22.87 ± 2.88b,d 25.91 ± 6.83 22.40 ± 4.31b 22.55 ± 3.31

n = 12 in each group

Ct.L longitudinal cortical bone, Ct.T transverse cortical bone, EL longitudinal modulus of indentation, ET transverse modulus of indentation, HL longitudinal indentation hardness, HT transverse indentation hardness, EL/HL ratio of longitudinal indentation modulus to indentation hardness, ET/HT ratio of transverse indentation modulus to indentation hardness, SED sedentary control group, EX12 exercise group with a speed of 12 m/min, EX16 exercise group with a speed of 16 m/min, EX20 exercise group with a speed of 20 m/min

aStatistically different from SED (p < 0.05)

bStatistically different from EX12 (p < 0.05)

cStatistically different from EX16 (p < 0.05)

dStatistically different from EX20 group (p < 0.05)