Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 18;11(3):221–235. doi: 10.2478/intox-2018-0021

Table 3.

Effect of Neurocalyx calycinus leaves ethanolic fraction on relative organ weights in sub-chronic oral toxicity study in Wistar rats.

#Organs Treatment group Satellite group
Control NCEF 50 mg/kg NCEF 500 mg/kg NCEF 1000 mg/kg Control NCEF 1000 mg/kg
Female
Liver 3.14 ± 0.13 3.05 ± 0.08ns 2.96 ± 0.12* 2.93 ± 0.15** 3.02 ± 0.09 3.03 ± 0.14ns
Kidney (L) 0.33 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.04ns 0.32 ± 0.02ns 0.34 ± 0.02ns 0.32 ± 0.02 0.32 ± 0.02ns
Kidney (R) 0.34 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.02ns 0.32 ± 0.03ns 0.35 ± 0.02ns 0.31 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01ns
Lungs 0.55 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.02ns 0.63 ± 0.06ns 0.55 ± 0.04ns 0.55 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.01ns
Spleen 0.29 ± 0.04 0.32 ± 0.05ns 0.37 ± 0.01ns 0.31 ± 0.01ns 0.35 ± 0.04 0.32 ± 0.04ns
Heart 0.36 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01ns 0.36 ± 0.02ns 0.34 ± 0.02ns 0.33 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.01ns
Brain 0.49 ± 0.01 0.55 ± 0.03ns 0.53 ± 0.03ns 0.52 ± 0.03ns 0.4 ± 0.01 0.51 ± 0.03ns
Ovary (L) 0.02 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01ns 0.02 ± 0.01ns 0.02 ± 0.01ns 0.02 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01ns
Ovary (R) 0.02 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01ns 0.02 ± 0.01ns 0.02 ± 0.01ns 0.02 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01ns
Male
Liver 2.86 ± 0.05 2.91 ± 0.16ns 2.89 ± 0.11ns 2.67 ± 0.08** 2.82 ± 0.03 2.84 ± 0.14ns
Kidney (L) 0.31 ± 0.02 0.30 ± 0.01ns 0.32 ± 0.01ns 0.32 ± 0.02ns 0.30 ± 0.02 0.30 ± 0.01ns
Kidney (R) 0.31 ± 0.02 0.32 ± 0.01ns 0.33 ± 0.01ns 0.35 ± 0.02ns 0.32 ± 0.01 0.31 ± 0.02ns
Lungs 0.50 ± 0.01 0.51 ± 0.02ns 0.52 ± 0.02ns 0.48 ± 0.01ns 0.54 ± 0.05 0.47 ± 0.01ns
Spleen 0.28 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.03ns 0.23 ± 0.03ns 0.29 ± 0.04ns 0.27 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.03ns
Heart 0.35 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.02ns 0.34 ± 0.01ns 0.36 ± 0.01ns 0.33 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01ns
Brain 0.49 ± 0.03 0.49 ± 0.04ns 0.46 ± 0.01ns 0.46 ± 0.01ns 0.44 ± 0.03 0.42 ± 0.02ns
Testis (L) 0.35 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01ns 0.35 ± 0.02ns 0.36 ± 0.01ns 0.33 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01ns
Testis (R) 0.35 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.01ns 0.34 ± 0.01ns 0.35 ± 0.01ns 0.32 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01ns

The values are expressed as Mean ± SEM, n=4. #g/100 g body weight. ns = non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 significantly different from the control group by using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. L, left; R, right.