Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 11;10(1):1682929. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1682929

Table 3.

Confusions of neutral with other emotional expressions: Effect statistics (Z score, P-values, odds ratios) for the standard model and models with better model fit.

Stimulus Response GV Z P PH 1-β OR, 95% CI
Neutral Anger Diagnostic group 1.47 0.142 0.284 0.32 1.97 [0.80, 4.89]
    CTQ sexual abuse 3.07 0.002 0.011* 0.83 3.37 [1.55, 7.33]
    CTQ physical neglect 2.94 0.003 0.013* 0.85 3.44 [1.51, 7.85]
    CTQ emotional abuse 1.79 0.073 0.219 0.44 2.13 [0.93, 4.85]
    interpersonal −1.05 0.295 0.295 0.18 0.57 [0.20, 1.63]
Neutral Contempt Diagnostic group 1.69 0.091 0.183 0.42 2.36 [0.87, 6.42]
    CTQ sexual abuse 2.97 0.003 0.015* 0.86 2.97 [1.45, 6.09]
    CTQ physical neglect 2.77 0.006 0.022* 0.78 2.76 [1.35, 5.66]
    CTQ emotional abuse 2.46 0.014 0.042* 0.74 2.51 [1.21, 5.23]
    interpersonal 0.58 0.563 0.563 0.10 1.35 [0.49, 3.72]
Neutral Fear Diagnostic group −0.47 0.639 1.000 0.09 0.82 [0.35, 1.90]
    CTQ sexual abuse 1.32 0.185 0.742 0.34 1.65 [0.79, 3.47]
    CTQ physical neglect 0.24 0.812 1.000 0.07 1.10 [0.52, 2.32]
    CTQ emotional abuse 0.71 0.478 1.000 0.11 1.30 [0.63, 2.70]
    interpersonal −1.84 0.066 0.331 0.40 0.40 [0.15, 1.06]
Neutral Sadness Diagnostic group 0.75 0.456 0.912 0.10 1.35 [0.62, 2.94]
    CTQ sexual abuse 1.67 0.095 0.474 0.46 1.62 [0.92, 2.84]
    CTQ physical neglect 1.35 0.178 0.534 0.28 1.49 [0.83, 2.67]
    CTQ emotional abuse 1.58 0.113 0.474 0.34 1.59 [0.90, 2.82]
    interpersonal 0.74 0.46 0.912 0.11 1.33 [0.62, 2.84]
Neutral Shame Diagnostic group −2.22 0.026 0.131 0.55 0.33 [0.12, 0.88]
    CTQ sexual abuse 0.42 0.673 0.958 0.08 1.21 [0.50, 2.88]
    CTQ physical neglect −1.78 0.075 0.224 0.43 0.47 [0.21, 1.08]
    CTQ emotional abuse −1.99 0.046 0.186 0.48 0.44 [0.20, 0.99]
    interpersonal −0.71 0.479 0.958 0.06 0.73 [0.30, 1.76]
Neutral Disgust Diagnostic group 0.08 0.935 1.000 0.00 1.07 [0.22, 5.31]
    CTQ sexual abuse 1.46 0.143 0.572 0.18 2.96 [0.69, 9.63]
    CTQ physical neglect 1.86 0.063 0.317 0.25 4.73 [0.92, 0.00]
    CTQ emotional abuse 0.31 0.757 1.000 0.08 1.25 [0.31, 5.01]
    interpersonal −1.27 0.205 0.616 0.08 0.24 [0.03, 2.17]
Neutral Surprise Diagnostic group −0.33 0.741 1.000 0.02 0.82 [0.25, 2.67]
    CTQ sexual abuse 1.03 0.303 1.000 0.19 1.79 [0.59, 5.41]
    CTQ physical neglect 0.7 0.485 1.000 0.10 1.49 [0.48, 4.60]
    CTQ emotional abuse −0.39 0.694 1.000 0.06 0.80 [0.26, 2.46]
    interpersonal −0.64 0.524 1.000 0.08 0.54 [0.08, 3.60]
Neutral Joy Diagnostic group 0.77 0.443 1.000 0.07 1.54 [0.51, 4.59]
    CTQ sexual abuse −0.4 0.689 1.000 0.05 0.80 [0.26, 2.41]
    CTQ physical neglect −0.58 0.563 1.000 0.10 0.73 [0.24, 2.15]
    CTQ emotional abuse −1.23 0.22 1.000 0.21 0.53 [0.19, 1.47]
    interpersonal −0.78 0.438 1.000 0.14 0.53 [0.11, 2.62]
Neutral Pride Diagnostic group −1.04 0.301 1.000 0.06 0.41 [0.07, 2.23]
    CTQ sexual abuse 0.19 0.847 1.000 0.17 1.15 [0.29, 4.60]
    CTQ physical neglect −0.4 0.687 1.000 0.01 0.78 [0.23, 2.67]
    CTQ emotional abuse 1.67 0.094 0.471 0.13 3.14 [0.82, 9.02]
    interpersonal −0.6 0.549 1.000 0.05 0.63 [0.14, 2.83]

GV = Grouping variable

CQT = Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

P = Probability under H0

PH = Bonferroni-holm corrected probability under H0

*p < .05

1-β = statistical power

OR = Odds ratio

CI = confidence interval

Effect statistics and Odds ratios refer to the comparisons between the groups with the highest and lowest traumatic burden (e.g. PTSD vs HC, high CTQ vs. low CTQ)