Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 11;10(1):1682929. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1682929

Table A2.

Confusions of other emotional expressions with neutral: Effect Statistics (Z score, P-values, odds ratios) for the Standard Model and Models with better Model Fit.

Stimulus Response GV Z P PH 1-β OR [95% CI]
Anger Neutral Diagnostic group −0.05 0.962 1.000 0.07 0.99 [0.58, 1.69]
    CTQ sexual abuse −0.70 0.485 1.000 0.14 0.84 [0.51, 1.37]
    CTQ physical neglect 0.09 0.927 1.000 0.04 1.02 [0.65, 1.59]
    CTQ emotional abuse −1.46 0.145 0.723 0.29 0.73 [0.48, 1.12]
    interpersonal 0.57 0.569 1.000 0.08 1.14 [0.72, 1.81]
Contempt Neutral Diagnostic group −1.04 0.300 0.300 0.17 0.78 [0.49, 1.25]
    CTQ sexual abuse −1.88 0.060 0.238 0.45 0.70 [0.48, 1.01]
    CTQ physical neglect −1.59 0.113 0.238 0.29 0.75 [0.53, 1.07]
    CTQ emotional abuse −2.16 0.030 0.152 0.55 0.68 [0.48, 0.96]
    interpersonal −1.80 0.071 0.238 0.36 0.67 [0.43, 1.04]
Fear Neutral Diagnostic group 1.41 0.158 0.633 0.27 1.86 [0.79, 4.38]
    CTQ sexual abuse 2.39 0.017 0.085 0.68 2.36 [1.17, 4.78]
    CTQ physical neglect −0.23 0.821 1.000 0.07 0.91 [0.42, 1.99]
    CTQ emotional abuse 0.57 0.566 1.000 0.10 1.23 [0.60, 2.53]
    interpersonal 1.21 0.228 0.683 0.24 1.76 [0.70, 4.40]
Sadness Neutral Diagnostic group 0.15 0.881 1.000 0.04 1.05 [0.57, 1.93]
    CTQ sexual abuse −0.13 0.895 1.000 0.06 0.96 [0.56, 1.66]
    CTQ physical neglect −0.55 0.581 1.000 0.08 0.86 [0.52, 1.45]
    CTQ emotional abuse −0.87 0.384 1.000 0.17 0.80 [0.48, 1.32]
    interpersonal 1.18 0.237 1.000 0.22 1.42 [0.79, 2.55]
Shame Neutral Diagnostic group 0.25 0.800 1.000 0.08 1.06 [0.68, 1.64]
    CTQ sexual abuse −0.60 0.549 1.000 0.07 0.88 [0.58, 1.34]
    CTQ physical neglect −1.23 0.217 1.000 0.22 0.79 [0.55, 1.15]
    CTQ emotional abuse −0.42 0.675 1.000 0.10 0.92 [0.64, 1.33]
    interpersonal −0.22 0.823 1.000 0.09 0.95 [0.62, 1.45]
Disgust Neutral Diagnostic group −0.01 0.996 1.000 0.02 1.00 [0.59, 1.68]
    CTQ sexual abuse 0.23 0.815 1.000 0.09 1.06 [0.64, 1.76]
    CTQ physical neglect 0.31 0.754 1.000 0.07 1.07 [0.69, 1.68]
    CTQ emotional abuse −0.77 0.440 1.000 0.15 0.85 [0.55, 1.29]
    interpersonal 0.04 0.969 1.000 0.06 1.01 [0.60, 1.71]
Surprise Neutral Diagnostic group 1.34 0.180 0.540 0.35 1.68 [0.79, 3.58]
    CTQ sexual abuse 2.25 0.025 0.123 0.61 2.09 [1.10, 3.98]
    CTQ physical neglect 0.52 0.604 1.000 0.07 1.20 [0.60, 2.38]
    CTQ emotional abuse 1.88 0.060 0.241 0.53 1.82 [0.97, 3.40]
    interpersonal 0.48 0.632 1.000 0.07 1.23 [0.53, 2.82]
Joy Neutral Diagnostic group 1.64 0.101 0.503 0.40 1.63 [0.91, 2.90]
    CTQ sexual abuse 1.63 0.102 0.503 0.36 1.48 [0.93, 2.36]
    CTQ physical neglect 0.90 0.370 0.971 0.15 1.23 [0.78, 1.96]
    CTQ emotional abuse 0.74 0.462 0.971 0.11 1.19 [0.75, 1.86]
    interpersonal 0.99 0.324 0.971 0.17 1.34 [0.75, 2.39]
Pride Neutral Diagnostic group 1.02 0.308 1.000 0.21 1.49 [0.69, 3.22]
    CTQ sexual abuse 0.77 0.443 1.000 0.15 1.33 [0.64, 2.76]
    CTQ physical neglect 1.17 0.242 1.000 0.25 1.50 [0.76, 2.96]
    CTQ emotional abuse 1.10 0.270 1.000 0.22 1.46 [0.75, 2.86]
    interpersonal −1.25 0.211 1.000 0.19 0.58 [0.25, 1.36]

GV = Grouping variable

CQT = Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

P = Probability under H0

PH = Bonferroni-holm corrected probability under H0

*p < .05

1-β = statistical power

OR = Odds ratio

CI = confidence interval

Effect statistics and Odds ratios refer to the comparisons between the groups with the highest and lowest traumatic burden (e.g. PTSD vs HC, high CTQ vs. low CTQ)