Table 3:
Comparison of prediction on the 2-D XRD data using the Gaussian and spatial horseshoe (SHS) models with ka basis functions in the angle and kr basis functions in the radius (SHS1-SHS6). Methods are compared using 100×(root mean squared error-1) as RMSE, coverage (%) and computing time per 100 iterations in minutes.
| Model | ka | kr | RMSE |
Coverage (%) |
Computing time (mins) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | ||||
| Gaussian | - | - | 3.64 | 0.08 | 94.72 | 0.02 | 2.78 |
| SHS1 | 4 | 10 | 3.59 | 0.08 | 94.78 | 0.02 | 6.57 |
| SHS2 | 4 | 25 | 3.57 | 0.08 | 94.79 | 0.02 | 9.91 |
| SHS3 | 4 | 50 | 3.55 | 0.08 | 94.80 | 0.03 | 17.45 |
| SHS4 | 4 | 100 | 3.54 | 0.08 | 94.80 | 0.02 | 41.61 |
| SHS5 | 8 | 5 | 3.56 | 0.08 | 94.80 | 0.02 | 7.38 |
| SHS6 | 8 | 25 | 3.50 | 0.09 | 94.84 | 0.02 | 8.62 |