Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: Technometrics. 2019 Mar 22;61(4):494–506. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2018.1546622

Table 3:

Comparison of prediction on the 2-D XRD data using the Gaussian and spatial horseshoe (SHS) models with ka basis functions in the angle and kr basis functions in the radius (SHS1-SHS6). Methods are compared using 100×(root mean squared error-1) as RMSE, coverage (%) and computing time per 100 iterations in minutes.

Model ka kr RMSE
Coverage (%)
Computing time (mins)
Estimate SE Estimate SE
Gaussian - - 3.64 0.08 94.72 0.02 2.78
SHS1 4 10 3.59 0.08 94.78 0.02 6.57
SHS2 4 25 3.57 0.08 94.79 0.02 9.91
SHS3 4 50 3.55 0.08 94.80 0.03 17.45
SHS4 4 100 3.54 0.08 94.80 0.02 41.61
SHS5 8 5 3.56 0.08 94.80 0.02 7.38
SHS6 8 25 3.50 0.09 94.84 0.02 8.62