Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;35(22):4688–4695. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz292

Table 4.

The recalls of annotating the PBMCs using scMatch and SingleR using ENCODE, BLUEPRINT and HPCA datasets

BLUEPRINT+ENCODE
HPCA
BLUEPRINT+ENCODE +HPCA
BLUEPRINT+ENCODE +HPCA+FANTOM5
SingleR (%) scMatch (%) SingleR (%) scMatch (%) SingleR (%) scMatch (%) scMatch (%)
CD4+/CD25+ Regulatory T cells 42.8 28.1 0.0 0.0 43.1 37.9 39.0
CD8+ Cytotoxic T cells 82.7 27.5 18.0 8.9 34.0 43.0 44.8
CD19+ B cells 99.9 66.5 100.0 99.9 90.5 99.0 99.2
CD56+ NK cells 99.2 95.8 95.1 93.3 95.0 98.4 98.5
CD4+ Helper T cells 94.5 86.4 99.5 99.5 93.5 98.2 97.9
CD14+ Monocytes 98.1 95.5 83.2 95.6 96.4 97.6 97.7
CD34+ cells 84.6 88.2 80.4 85.3 88.5 85.7 85.3
CD4+/CD45RO+ Memory T cells 75.4 80.8 95.3 97.5 73.1 86.8 86.0
CD4+/CD45RA+/CD25− Naive T cells N/A N/A 85.3 85.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
CD8+/CD45RA+ Naive Cytotoxic T cells N/A N/A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Note: Comparison of scMatch and SingleR using different reference datasets. Annotation recall is calculated as in Table 3. (i) We used SingleR in fine-tuning mode, (ii) There are no matched reference samples in the BLUEPRINT + ENCODE database for CD4+/CD45RA+/CD25− Naïve T cells and CD8+/CD45RA+ Naïve cytotoxic T cells.