Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 19;103:301–313. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.010

Table 6.

ToxCast Bioactivity data and Model prediction scores (AUC values) for ER and AR activities for p,p’-DDD and Analoguesa

p,p’-DDD p,p’-DDT p,p’-DDE Methoxychlor
ER Assays
Active/Total Assays (%) 7/18 (39) 11/18 (61) 8/18 (44) 14/18 (78)
AC50 values (μM) Range = 14.0 – 32.4
Median = 18.7
Range = 3.3 – 59.8
Median = 6.1
Range = 3.5–46.2
Median = 16.5
Range = 0.9 – 44.2
Median = 4.6
Agonist AUC values (95% CI)b 0.0715 (0.0342–0.0738) 0.190 (0.181–0.231) 0.0679 (0.0614–0.0963) 0.254 (0.247–0.260)
Antagonist AUC values (95% CI) 0 0 0 0
AR assays
Active/Total Assays (%) 4/11 (36) 3/11 (27) 4/11 (36) 3/11 (27)
AC50 values (μM) Range = 31.0–62.8
Median = 44.8
Range = 17.8–72.0
Median = 47.0
Range = 7.0 – 58.7
Median = 29.6
Range = 29.3 – 40.8
Median = 34.2
Agonist AUC values (95% CI) 0 0 0 0
Antagonist AUC values (95% CI) 0.0973 (0.0649–0.124) 0.0642 (0.0318–0.108) 0.251 (0.234–0.291) 0.0429 (0.0364–0.0465)
a

Data for ER and AR activities were sourced from Judson et al., (2015) and Kleinstreuer et al., (2016), respectively.

b

95% CI for the ER activity model were sourced from a subsequent publication to the Judson et al., (2015) study (Watt and Judson, 2018).

AUC = area under the curve score ranging from 0–1. An AUC value of 0 indicates that the chemcial is inactive.

CI = confidence interval.