Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;18:162. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1081-4

Table 1.

Relationship between circLMTK2 expression and clinicopathologic factors of patients with gastric cancer

Parameter No. of patients circLMTK2 (high) circLMTK2 (low) P -value
Sex 0.871
 male 67 35 32
 female 53 26 27
Age (year) 0.965
  < 60 46 24 22
  ≥ 60 74 37 37
Tumor site 0.681
 Upper 26 12 14
 Middle 35 17 18
 Lower 47 24 23
 Diffuse 12 8 4
Tumor size (cm) 0.279
  < 5 54 24 30
  ≥ 5 66 37 29
Differentiation grade 0.734
 Well-moderate 50 24 26
 Poor-undifferentiation 70 37 33
Lauren classification 0.812
 Intestinal 58 29 29
 Diffuse 37 20 17
 Mixed 20 9 11
 Uncertain 5 3 2
T stage 0.017*
 T1-T3 65 26 39
 T4 55 35 20
Lymph node status 0.029*
 Negative 56 22 34
 Positive 64 39 25
Distant metastasis 0.227
 M0 109 53 56
 M1 11 8 3
TNM stage 0.004*
 I-II 56 20 36
 III-IV 64 41 23
Lymphatic invasion 0.446
 Negative 51 29 22
 Positive 69 32 37
Nervous invasion 0.694
 Negative 52 28 24
 Positive 68 33 35

The TNM Staging System is based on the tumor (T), the extent of spread to the lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastasis (M)

* P < 0.05