Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Pediatr. 2018 Jul 23;18(8):935–943. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.07.004

Table 3.

Professional Interpreter Use and Provider Discharge Communication Behaviors

Communication Interaction Analysis
Provider Discharge Communication Behavior (Outcome) Professional Interpreter Use (Predictor) Adjusted Odds Ratio* (95% Confidence Interval)
Complete discharge education
None Reference
Professional interpreter 7.1 (1.4–37.0)
Bilingual provider 2.7 (0.2–46.5)
High-quality assessment
None Reference
Professional interpreter 6.1 (2.3–15.9)
Bilingual provider §
*

Adjusted for Emergency Severity Index triage acuity (high vs low) on presentation to the emergency department.

Discharge education considered complete if ≥3 key components of discharge education content were present in the communication interaction; n = 58 communication interactions containing discharge education for patients discharged to home.

Assessment of caregiver understanding was considered high quality if the communication interaction included teach-back or an invitation for the caregiver to ask questions; n = 101 communication interactions containing discharge education for all patients.

§

Dropped from model owing to small sample size (n = 3).